Skip to content
SlateIndex
AshbyAll-in-one recruiting software for ambitious teams
vs
JuiceboxThe AI Recruiting Platform that learns how you search, so you source better talent, faster.
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Ashby vs Juicebox

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Ashby is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 17.4 versus 2 for Juicebox, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.

Choose Ashby if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.4 vs 2)
  • You need more native integrations (250+ vs 100+)
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat

Choose Juicebox if…

  • You want a free plan to start
  • AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 57% positive)
  • You need GDPR coverage
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Ashby Juicebox
Visibility score17.4%2%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#7#39
Share of voice3.8%0.5%
Mentions this run213
Positive in AI answers57%67%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Ashby 17%

Ashby 0pp · Juicebox 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Ashby leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
23.3%
2.8%
AI Mode
8.2%
0%
Perplexity
20.7%
3.1%
AshbyJuicebox

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

0Ashby ranked higher
1Juicebox ranked higher
PromptEngineAshbyJuicebox
Which recruiting tools offer annual discounts? ChatGPT#10#7

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAshbyJuicebox
Pricing modelFlat tiersPer seat
Entry price$400 / moFree; paid from $99 per seat / mo
Free planNoYes
DeploymentCloud-hosted software as a service on Amazon Web Services, sold on subscription plans—
Integrations250+100+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type IISOC 2 Type II, GDPR
SupportCustomer success teamKnowledge base, Help center, Chat and email support, Priority support (email, chat, Slack) with 24-hour response times on the Business plan
Founded20182022
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CA, United StatesSan Francisco, California
Employees201–50051–200
FundingSeries D · $120M raisedSeed · $116M raised
Best forAmbitious, scaling companies from startups to enterprises that want one system for hiringRecruiters and talent teams searching for hard-to-find talent, from startups and enterprises to recruiting agencies.

Plans side by side

Ashby

All-In-One Foundations$400month
All-In-One PlusCustomcontact sales
All-In-One EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Ashby AnalyticsCustomusage-based
Ashby pricing

Juicebox

Free$0per seat/month
Starter$99per seat/month
Growth$179per seat/month
BusinessCustomcustom, annual only
Juicebox pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Ashby

  • Deep data visibility
  • Advanced analytics and detailed funnel reporting
  • Strong fit for well-funded, scaling tech startups
  • Good for data-driven recruiting teams
  • Strong shortlist choice for recruiting software

    Juicebox

    • quick online setup
    • free starting option

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Ashby vs Juicebox”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/ashby-vs-juicebox, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.