AshbyAll-in-one recruiting software for ambitious teams
vs
JuiceboxThe AI Recruiting Platform that learns how you search, so you source better talent, faster.
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Ashby vs Juicebox
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Ashby is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 17.4 versus 2 for Juicebox, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Ashby if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.4 vs 2)
- You need more native integrations (250+ vs 100+)
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose Juicebox if…
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 57% positive)
- You need GDPR coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Ashby | Juicebox |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 17.4% | 2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #7 | #39 |
| Share of voice | 3.8% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 21 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 57% | 67% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Ashby 0pp · Juicebox 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Ashby leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AshbyJuicebox
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0Ashby ranked higher
1Juicebox ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Ashby | Juicebox |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which recruiting tools offer annual discounts? | ChatGPT | #10 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Ashby | Juicebox |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | $400 / mo | Free; paid from $99 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted software as a service on Amazon Web Services, sold on subscription plans | — |
| Integrations | 250+ | 100+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR |
| Support | Customer success team | Knowledge base, Help center, Chat and email support, Priority support (email, chat, Slack) with 24-hour response times on the Business plan |
| Founded | 2018 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | San Francisco, California |
| Employees | 201–500 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series D · $120M raised | Seed · $116M raised |
| Best for | Ambitious, scaling companies from startups to enterprises that want one system for hiring | Recruiters and talent teams searching for hard-to-find talent, from startups and enterprises to recruiting agencies. |
Plans side by side
Ashby
All-In-One Foundations$400month
All-In-One PlusCustomcontact sales
All-In-One EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Ashby AnalyticsCustomusage-based
Juicebox
Free$0per seat/month
Starter$99per seat/month
Growth$179per seat/month
BusinessCustomcustom, annual only
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Ashby
- Deep data visibility
- Advanced analytics and detailed funnel reporting
- Strong fit for well-funded, scaling tech startups
- Good for data-driven recruiting teams
- Strong shortlist choice for recruiting software
Juicebox
- quick online setup
- free starting option
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Ashby vs Juicebox”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/ashby-vs-juicebox, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.