AshbyAll-in-one recruiting software for ambitious teams
vs
LoxoThe AI recruiting platform for scaling firms
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Ashby vs Loxo
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Ashby is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 17.4 versus 1.9 for Loxo, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Ashby if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.4 vs 1.9)
- You need more native integrations (250+ vs 100+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (57% vs 17% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
Choose Loxo if…
- You want a lower entry price ($149 vs $400)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- 7-day free trial
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Ashby | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 17.4% | 1.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #7 | #40 |
| Share of voice | 3.8% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 21 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 57% | 17% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Ashby 0pp · Loxo 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Ashby leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AshbyLoxo
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1Ashby ranked higher
0Loxo ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Ashby | Loxo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which recruiting tools offer annual discounts? | Perplexity | #8 | #11 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Ashby | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | $400 / mo | $149 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 7-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted software as a service on Amazon Web Services, sold on subscription plans | — |
| Integrations | 250+ | 100+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | — |
| Support | Customer success team | Dedicated success team and priority support on Enterprise plans, Free migration for Core teams of 3+ seats, with guided self-serve tooling below that |
| Founded | 2018 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | Austin, Texas |
| Employees | 201–500 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series D · $120M raised | Growth investment led by Tritium Partners · $115M raised |
| Best for | Ambitious, scaling companies from startups to enterprises that want one system for hiring | Scaling recruiting firms, including executive search, recruiting, staffing and RPO firms, and in-house talent teams |
Plans side by side
Ashby
All-In-One Foundations$400month
All-In-One PlusCustomcontact sales
All-In-One EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Ashby AnalyticsCustomusage-based
Loxo
Core$149per user / month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustombilled annually, contact sales for pricing
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual agreement
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Ashby
- Deep data visibility
- Advanced analytics and detailed funnel reporting
- Strong fit for well-funded, scaling tech startups
- Good for data-driven recruiting teams
- Strong shortlist choice for recruiting software
Loxo
- 7-day free trial
- High per-user pricing
- Annual-only plans paid upfront
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Ashby vs Loxo”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/ashby-vs-loxo, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.