AshbyAll-in-one recruiting software for ambitious teams
vs
RecruitBPMAI-Powered Applicant Tracking, CRM and Hiring Automation Platform for the Top Staffing Professionals
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Ashby vs RecruitBPM
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Ashby is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 17.4 versus 1.7 for RecruitBPM.
Choose Ashby if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.4 vs 1.7)
- You need more native integrations (250+ vs 200+)
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
Choose RecruitBPM if…
- You want a lower entry price ($29 vs $400)
- You need GDPR coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Ashby | RecruitBPM |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 17.4% | 1.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #7 | #43 |
| Share of voice | 3.8% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 21 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 57% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Ashby 0pp · RecruitBPM 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Ashby leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AshbyRecruitBPM
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Ashby ranked higher
0RecruitBPM ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Ashby | RecruitBPM |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $400 / mo | $29 / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted software as a service on Amazon Web Services, sold on subscription plans | Cloud-based |
| Integrations | 250+ | 200+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | GDPR |
| Support | Customer success team | Account manager and technical team training after subscription, Video training, Built-in knowledgebase, Email support at support@recruitbpm.com |
| Founded | 2018 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | Eden Prairie, MN, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series D · $120M raised | — |
| Best for | Ambitious, scaling companies from startups to enterprises that want one system for hiring | Staffing and recruitment firms |
Plans side by side
Ashby
All-In-One Foundations$400month
All-In-One PlusCustomcontact sales
All-In-One EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Ashby AnalyticsCustomusage-based
RecruitBPM
Staffing Agency Premium (monthly billing)$89user/month billed monthly
Staffing Agency Premium (annual billing)$59user/month billed annually
Essential (annual billing, lower price set)$29month
Premium (annual billing, lower price set)$69month
Enterprise (annual billing, lower price set)$169month
Essential (monthly billing, higher price set)$39month
Premium (monthly billing, higher price set)$99month
Enterprise (monthly billing, higher price set)$199month
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Ashby
- Deep data visibility
- Advanced analytics and detailed funnel reporting
- Strong fit for well-funded, scaling tech startups
- Good for data-driven recruiting teams
- Strong shortlist choice for recruiting software
RecruitBPM
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Ashby vs RecruitBPM”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/ashby-vs-recruitbpm, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.