AshbyAll-in-one recruiting software for ambitious teams
vs
RecruiterflowAI-native ATS and CRM for executive search, recruiting and staffing agencies
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Ashby vs Recruiterflow
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Ashby is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 17.4 versus 3.1 for Recruiterflow, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Ashby if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.4 vs 3.1)
- You need more native integrations (250+ vs 30+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (57% vs 33% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
Choose Recruiterflow if…
- You want a lower entry price ($149 vs $400)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 1 or ISO 27001 or GDPR coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- Attractive for recruitment agencies and staffing teams
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Ashby | Recruiterflow |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 17.4% | 3.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #7 | #30 |
| Share of voice | 3.8% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 21 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 57% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Ashby 0pp · Recruiterflow 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Ashby leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AshbyRecruiterflow
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
0Ashby ranked higher
2Recruiterflow ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Ashby | Recruiterflow |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which recruiting tools offer annual discounts? | ChatGPT | #10 | #3 |
| Which recruiting tools offer annual discounts? | Perplexity | #8 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Ashby | Recruiterflow |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | $400 / mo | $149 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted software as a service on Amazon Web Services, sold on subscription plans | SaaS |
| Integrations | 250+ | 30+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 1, ISO 27001, GDPR |
| Support | Customer success team | SLA-backed support, Dedicated implementation, Live chat with a rep, FAQ and help articles |
| Founded | 2018 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series D · $120M raised | Bootstrapped |
| Best for | Ambitious, scaling companies from startups to enterprises that want one system for hiring | Retained, contingent and executive search firms and recruiting and staffing agencies that want AI tools alongside a full ATS and CRM |
Plans side by side
Ashby
All-In-One Foundations$400month
All-In-One PlusCustomcontact sales
All-In-One EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Ashby AnalyticsCustomusage-based
Recruiterflow
Platform Plan$149per user / month
AIRA PlanCustomcustom pricing (contact sales)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Ashby
- Deep data visibility
- Advanced analytics and detailed funnel reporting
- Strong fit for well-funded, scaling tech startups
- Good for data-driven recruiting teams
- Strong shortlist choice for recruiting software
Recruiterflow
- Attractive for recruitment agencies and staffing teams
- Priced at $119/user/month billed annually
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Ashby vs Recruiterflow”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/ashby-vs-recruiterflow, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.