AshbyAll-in-one recruiting software for ambitious teams
vs
SourceWhaleThe AI recruitment platform that captures everything, automatically.
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Ashby vs SourceWhale
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Ashby is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 17.4 versus 0.3 for SourceWhale.
Choose Ashby if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.4 vs 0.3)
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Deep data visibility
Choose SourceWhale if…
- You need GDPR or CCPA or ISO/IEC 27001 or SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
- Strong multi-channel candidate engagement via email and LinkedIn automation
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Ashby | SourceWhale |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 17.4% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #7 | #62 |
| Share of voice | 3.8% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 21 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 57% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Ashby 0pp · SourceWhale 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Ashby leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AshbySourceWhale
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Ashby ranked higher
0SourceWhale ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Ashby | SourceWhale |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | $400 / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted software as a service on Amazon Web Services, sold on subscription plans | Cloud-hosted |
| Integrations | 250+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | GDPR, CCPA, ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2 Type 2 |
| Support | Customer success team | — |
| Founded | 2018 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | London, United Kingdom |
| Employees | 201–500 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series D · $120M raised | Round led by Blackfinch Ventures, with Downing Ventures participating (reported as £1.5m, undated) |
| Best for | Ambitious, scaling companies from startups to enterprises that want one system for hiring | Recruitment, staffing and executive search firms that want to replace several separate recruiting tools with one platform. |
Plans side by side
Ashby
All-In-One Foundations$400month
All-In-One PlusCustomcontact sales
All-In-One EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Ashby AnalyticsCustomusage-based
SourceWhale
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Ashby
- Deep data visibility
- Advanced analytics and detailed funnel reporting
- Strong fit for well-funded, scaling tech startups
- Good for data-driven recruiting teams
- Strong shortlist choice for recruiting software
SourceWhale
- Strong multi-channel candidate engagement via email and LinkedIn automation
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Ashby vs SourceWhale”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/ashby-vs-sourcewhale, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.