Auth0 vs Authentik
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Auth0 is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 17.2 versus 2.7 for Authentik, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Auth0 if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.2 vs 2.7)
- You need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27018 coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Developer-friendly customer identity and authentication
Choose Authentik if…
- You want a lower entry price ($5 vs $35)
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 47% positive)
- You need OpenID Certified coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Auth0 | Authentik |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 17.2% | 2.7% |
| Change vs last week | up+2.6% | up+1.7% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #5 | #24 |
| Share of voice | 5.4% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 17 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 47% | 67% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Auth0 +3.3999999999999986pp · Authentik +1.0000000000000002pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Auth0 leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Auth0 | Authentik |
|---|---|---|---|
| Is there a free identity and access management platform for small teams? | Perplexity | #6 | #5 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Auth0 | Authentik |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $35 / mo | Free; paid from $5 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (multi-tenant public cloud) or private cloud | Self-hosted (Kubernetes, Terraform, Docker Compose, AWS CloudFormation); no hosted version offered |
| Compliance | SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27018 | OpenID Certified |
| Support | Community forum, Standard support, Premier support, 24/7 support | Community Discord, GitHub community support, Ticket-based support (Enterprise over $1k), Dedicated support with SLAs (Enterprise Plus) |
| Founded | 2013 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Bellevue, WA, United States | — |
| Employees | — | 1–10 |
| Funding | Series D · $332M raised | Later-stage VC · $2M raised |
| Best for | Development teams adding login, SSO and authorization to B2C apps, B2B SaaS and AI agents | Organizations that want to self-host their identity provider and keep control of their identity data, from homelabs to enterprises with thousands of users. |
Plans side by side
Auth0
Authentik
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Auth0
- Developer-friendly customer identity and authentication
- Strong, customizable CIAM for customer-facing applications
- Default favorite for developer-centric consumer identity
- Published plan tiers and pricing with clear limits
- Free tier for getting started
Authentik
- fully open-source, self-hosted IAM platform
- modern UI
- easy to administer
- affordable, reliable, secure IAM platform for business use
- highly flexible with built-in MFA and proxy outposts
- you must manage hosting, updates, backups, and security yourself
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Auth0 vs Authentik”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/auth0-vs-authentik, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.