Skip to content
SlateIndex
Auth0Authentication and authorization platform for users, AI agents and APIs
vs
OktaSecuring every identity, from AI to human
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3

Auth0 vs Okta

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Okta is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 56.9 versus 17.2 for Auth0, and ranks ahead in 86% of the answers that name both.

Choose Auth0 if…

  • You want a free plan to start
  • AI answers describe it more positively (47% vs 39% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27018 coverage
  • Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat

Choose Okta if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (56.9 vs 17.2)
  • You want a lower entry price ($6 vs $35)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or SOC 2 Type II or FedRAMP High or FedRAMP Moderate or FIPS 140-2 or DoD Impact Level 4 coverage
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Auth0 Okta
Visibility score17.2%56.9%
Change vs last weekup+2.6%down−0.9%
Rank in Identity & Access Management#5#2
Share of voice5.4%12.2%
Mentions this run1738
Positive in AI answers47%39%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Auth0 17%

Auth0 +3.3999999999999986pp · Okta −3.3000000000000043pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Okta leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
11.4%
68.4%
AI Mode
18.9%
60%
Perplexity
15.6%
53.9%
Auth0Okta

Head to head in AI answers

22 engine answers name both brands

3Auth0 ranked higher
19Okta ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAuth0Okta
Pricing modelUsage-basedPer seat
Entry priceFree; paid from $35 / mo$6 per seat / mo
Free planYesNo · 30-day trial
DeploymentCloud (multi-tenant public cloud) or private cloudCloud (SaaS)
Integrations—8000+
ComplianceSOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27018ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP High, FedRAMP Moderate, FIPS 140-2, DoD Impact Level 4
SupportCommunity forum, Standard support, Premier support, 24/7 supportOnline support (24x5), Knowledge base, Community forum, Premier Success Plans
Founded20132009
HeadquartersBellevue, WA, United StatesSan Francisco, California, United States
Employees—5,000+
FundingSeries D · $332M raisedIPO
Best forDevelopment teams adding login, SSO and authorization to B2C apps, B2B SaaS and AI agentsOrganizations that need to secure workforce, customer, partner and AI agent identities from one cloud identity platform.

Plans side by side

Auth0

Free$0month
Essentials$35month (500 MAU)
Professional$240month (500 MAU)
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Auth0 pricing

Okta

Starter$6user/month, billed annually
Core Essentials$14user/month, billed annually
Essentials$17user/month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustomuser/month
EnterpriseCustomuser/month
Okta pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Auth0

  • Developer-friendly customer identity and authentication
  • Strong, customizable CIAM for customer-facing applications
  • Default favorite for developer-centric consumer identity
  • Published plan tiers and pricing with clear limits
  • Free tier for getting started

    Okta

    • Market-leading IAM platform
    • Independent, cloud-native identity platform
    • Broad SaaS integrations with SSO and MFA
    • Top overall enterprise IAM recommendation
    • Strong security effectiveness

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Auth0 vs Okta”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/auth0-vs-okta, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.