Auth0 vs Okta
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Okta is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 56.9 versus 17.2 for Auth0, and ranks ahead in 86% of the answers that name both.
Choose Auth0 if…
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (47% vs 39% positive)
- You need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27018 coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose Okta if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (56.9 vs 17.2)
- You want a lower entry price ($6 vs $35)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or SOC 2 Type II or FedRAMP High or FedRAMP Moderate or FIPS 140-2 or DoD Impact Level 4 coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Auth0 | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 17.2% | 56.9% |
| Change vs last week | up+2.6% | down−0.9% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #5 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 5.4% | 12.2% |
| Mentions this run | 17 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | 47% | 39% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Auth0 +3.3999999999999986pp · Okta −3.3000000000000043pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Okta leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
22 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Auth0 | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $35 / mo | $6 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 30-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud (multi-tenant public cloud) or private cloud | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Integrations | — | 8000+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27018 | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP High, FedRAMP Moderate, FIPS 140-2, DoD Impact Level 4 |
| Support | Community forum, Standard support, Premier support, 24/7 support | Online support (24x5), Knowledge base, Community forum, Premier Success Plans |
| Founded | 2013 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Bellevue, WA, United States | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | — | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Series D · $332M raised | IPO |
| Best for | Development teams adding login, SSO and authorization to B2C apps, B2B SaaS and AI agents | Organizations that need to secure workforce, customer, partner and AI agent identities from one cloud identity platform. |
Plans side by side
Auth0
Okta
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Auth0
- Developer-friendly customer identity and authentication
- Strong, customizable CIAM for customer-facing applications
- Default favorite for developer-centric consumer identity
- Published plan tiers and pricing with clear limits
- Free tier for getting started
Okta
- Market-leading IAM platform
- Independent, cloud-native identity platform
- Broad SaaS integrations with SSO and MFA
- Top overall enterprise IAM recommendation
- Strong security effectiveness
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Auth0 vs Okta”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/auth0-vs-okta, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.