AWS IAMSecurely control access to AWS services
vs
CyberArkUnified IAM, PAM, and IGA identity security platform.
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
AWS IAM vs CyberArk
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
CyberArk is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 15.6 versus 5.1 for AWS IAM, and ranks ahead in 67% of the answers that name both.
Choose AWS IAM if…
- You need SOC 1 or ISO 9001 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or FedRAMP or DoD SRG or PCI DSS Level 1 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- Well suited to infrastructure centered on AWS
- Free core federation and multi-account management
Choose CyberArk if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (15.6 vs 5.1)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or ISO 9001:2015 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO 22301 or CSA STAR or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or FedRAMP High or Common Criteria or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or HIPAA or IRAP or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
- Strong identity security and credential risk mitigation
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | AWS IAM | CyberArk |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.1% | 15.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | up+2.1% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #19 | #7 |
| Share of voice | 1.6% | 6.1% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 19 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 49% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
AWS IAM +5.1pp · CyberArk +0.5pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
CyberArk leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AWS IAMCyberArk
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
1AWS IAM ranked higher
2CyberArk ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | AWS IAM | CyberArk |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Identity & Access Management tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #7 | #5 |
| Compare the leading Identity & Access Management platforms | Perplexity | #9 | #6 |
| Which Identity & Access Management vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #2 | #5 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | AWS IAM | CyberArk |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | — | Self-hosted and SaaS |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO 9001, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, FedRAMP, DoD SRG, PCI DSS Level 1 | SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO 9001:2015, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO 22301, CSA STAR, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, FedRAMP High, Common Criteria, PCI DSS v4.0.1, HIPAA, IRAP, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | — | Support contact, Knowledge base, Technical community |
| Founded | — | 1999 |
| Headquarters | Seattle, Washington | Newton, MA, United States |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | — | Post-IPO debt |
| Best for | — | Enterprises that need to secure privileged access for human and machine identities. |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
AWS IAM
- Well suited to infrastructure centered on AWS
- Free core federation and multi-account management
- Ranked second overall by ISG
- Listed among strong identity platforms for 2026
CyberArk
- Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
- Strong identity security and credential risk mitigation
- Security-first approach with strong behavioral analytics
- Bridges standard access management with robust PAM and machine identity security
- Strong for enterprises combining workforce identity with PAM
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “AWS IAM vs CyberArk”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/aws-iam-vs-cyberark, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.