Bitwarden vs Keeper Security
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Bitwarden is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 5.6 versus 0.5 for Keeper Security.
Choose Bitwarden if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.6 vs 0.5)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 0% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
Choose Keeper Security if…
- You need ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or SOC 2 Type 2 or FedRAMP High or GovRAMP High or FIPS 140-3 or PCI DSS Level 1 or FDA 21 CFR Part 11 or TRUSTe coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Bitwarden | Keeper Security |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.6% | 0.5% |
| Change vs last week | up+3.4% | down−0.1% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #14 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 3% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Bitwarden +4.199999999999999pp · Keeper Security −0.19999999999999996pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Bitwarden leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Bitwarden | Keeper Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $1.65 per seat / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Cloud or self-hosted | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Integrations | — | 100+ |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, HIPAA, GDPR, Data Privacy Framework | ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, FedRAMP High, GovRAMP High, FIPS 140-3, PCI DSS Level 1, HIPAA, GDPR, FDA 21 CFR Part 11, TRUSTe |
| Support | 24/7 email support, Priority support for paid users, Dedicated engagement success manager, Dedicated onboarding and training | Phone support, Live chat, Documentation, Keeper University |
| Founded | 2016 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Santa Barbara, California, USA | Chicago, Illinois, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Growth round led by PSG | Minority growth equity (Summit Partners) · $60M raised |
| Best for | Individuals, teams and enterprises wanting an affordable, auditable password manager with self-hosting option | Organizations wanting password, secrets and privileged access management in one zero-knowledge cloud platform |
Plans side by side
Bitwarden
Keeper Security
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Bitwarden
- Team vaults share app credentials without revealing plaintext passwords
- Recognised as an enterprise-grade option
Keeper Security
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Bitwarden vs Keeper Security”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/bitwarden-vs-keeper-security, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.