Bitwarden vs Okta
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Okta is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 56.9 versus 5.6 for Bitwarden, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Bitwarden if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO 27001 or SOC 3 or HIPAA or GDPR or Data Privacy Framework coverage
- Team vaults share app credentials without revealing plaintext passwords
Choose Okta if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (56.9 vs 5.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (39% vs 33% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or FedRAMP High or FedRAMP Moderate or FIPS 140-2 or DoD Impact Level 4 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Bitwarden | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.6% | 56.9% |
| Change vs last week | up+3.4% | down−0.9% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #14 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 3% | 12.2% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 39% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Bitwarden +4.199999999999999pp · Okta −3.3000000000000043pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Okta leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
8 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Bitwarden | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $1.65 per seat / mo | $6 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 30-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud or self-hosted | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Integrations | — | 8000+ |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, HIPAA, GDPR, Data Privacy Framework | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP High, FedRAMP Moderate, FIPS 140-2, DoD Impact Level 4 |
| Support | 24/7 email support, Priority support for paid users, Dedicated engagement success manager, Dedicated onboarding and training | Online support (24x5), Knowledge base, Community forum, Premier Success Plans |
| Founded | 2016 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Santa Barbara, California, USA | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Growth round led by PSG | IPO |
| Best for | Individuals, teams and enterprises wanting an affordable, auditable password manager with self-hosting option | Organizations that need to secure workforce, customer, partner and AI agent identities from one cloud identity platform. |
Plans side by side
Bitwarden
Okta
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Bitwarden
- Team vaults share app credentials without revealing plaintext passwords
- Recognised as an enterprise-grade option
Okta
- Market-leading IAM platform
- Independent, cloud-native identity platform
- Broad SaaS integrations with SSO and MFA
- Top overall enterprise IAM recommendation
- Strong security effectiveness
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Bitwarden vs Okta”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/bitwarden-vs-okta, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.