BloomfireKnowledge Management
vs
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
Bloomfire vs Qwilr
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 1.5 versus 0 for Bloomfire.
Choose Bloomfire if…
- Robust natural language Ask AI capabilities
- Enterprise search and AI-powered author assistance
- Strong fit for enterprise intelligence and AI search
- Suited to sales enablement and market research
Choose Qwilr if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.5 vs 0)
- AI answers describe it more positively (51% vs 40% positive)
- You need PCI-DSS coverage
- Interactive, web-based proposals
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Bloomfire | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #42 | #28 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 40% | 51% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Bloomfire 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qwilr leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
BloomfireQwilr
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Bloomfire ranked higher
0Qwilr ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Bloomfire | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $35 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Web-based, web-native software |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS |
| Support | — | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions |
| Founded | 2010 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series C (CB Insights lists as private equity), led by Primus Capital · $33M raised | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised |
| Best for | — | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. |
Plans side by side
Bloomfire
Pricing not available.
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Bloomfire
- Robust natural language Ask AI capabilities
- Enterprise search and AI-powered author assistance
- Strong fit for enterprise intelligence and AI search
- Suited to sales enablement and market research
- Strong peer-review ratings
- Pricing not publicly disclosed
- Less transparent review volume
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Bloomfire vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/bloomfire-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.