Bubble vs Claris FileMaker
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Bubble is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 23 versus 1.6 for Claris FileMaker, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Bubble if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (23 vs 1.6)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR support coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
Choose Claris FileMaker if…
- You want a lower entry price ($22 vs $32)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Bubble | Claris FileMaker |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 23% | 1.6% |
| Change vs last week | up+0.1% | New |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #5 | #37 |
| Share of voice | 5.3% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 32 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 36% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Bubble 0pp · Claris FileMaker +1.6pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Bubble leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Bubble | Claris FileMaker |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which low-code platform offers a free trial? | ChatGPT | #5 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Bubble | Claris FileMaker |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $32 / mo | $22 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Bubble-hosted cloud platform; enterprise customers can get a dedicated instance on AWS with a choice of region | Cloud (FileMaker Cloud on AWS) or self-hosted (FileMaker Server) |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR support | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27018 |
| Support | Community forum, Dedicated support team on Enterprise plan | Technical support from Claris teams, Around-the-clock monitoring by Claris teams, Claris Academy certifications, Online community forums |
| Founded | 2012 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | New York, NY, United States | Sunnyvale, California |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series A · $106M raised | Later Stage VC · $1M raised |
| Best for | Founders, startups and teams that want to build and launch web and mobile apps without writing code | Teams that want custom business apps built without writing code, from small businesses to large enterprises |
Plans side by side
Bubble
Claris FileMaker
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Bubble
- Powerful visual full-stack web app builder
- Best for customer-facing web apps and SaaS MVPs
- Free tier useful for learning and prototyping
- Annual billing saves up to 20%
- Fast MVP speed and workflow flexibility
- Free tier limited to development and testing; live publishing and custom domains need a paid plan
- Less suited to heavily governed enterprise systems
- Less portability and deep architectural control
Claris FileMaker
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Bubble vs Claris FileMaker”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/bubble-vs-claris-filemaker, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.