Skip to content
SlateIndex
BubbleVisual no-code builder for web and mobile apps, with AI
vs
Claris FileMakerBuild custom apps, automate work, and integrate systems
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3

Bubble vs Claris FileMaker

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Bubble is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 23 versus 1.6 for Claris FileMaker, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Bubble if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (23 vs 1.6)
  • You want a free plan to start
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR support coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)

Choose Claris FileMaker if…

  • You want a lower entry price ($22 vs $32)
  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Bubble Claris FileMaker
Visibility score23%1.6%
Change vs last weekup+0.1%New
Rank in Low-Code & No-Code#5#37
Share of voice5.3%0.3%
Mentions this run322
Positive in AI answers36%—

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Bubble 23%

Bubble 0pp · Claris FileMaker +1.6pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Bubble leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
25.9%
1.1%
AI Mode
15.6%
0%
Perplexity
27.6%
3.7%
BubbleClaris FileMaker

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

1Bubble ranked higher
0Claris FileMaker ranked higher
PromptEngineBubbleClaris FileMaker
Which low-code platform offers a free trial? ChatGPT#5#7

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionBubbleClaris FileMaker
Pricing modelUsage-basedPer seat
Entry priceFree; paid from $32 / mo$22 per seat / mo
Free planYesNo
DeploymentBubble-hosted cloud platform; enterprise customers can get a dedicated instance on AWS with a choice of regionCloud (FileMaker Cloud on AWS) or self-hosted (FileMaker Server)
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, GDPR supportSOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27018
SupportCommunity forum, Dedicated support team on Enterprise planTechnical support from Claris teams, Around-the-clock monitoring by Claris teams, Claris Academy certifications, Online community forums
Founded20122019
HeadquartersNew York, NY, United StatesSunnyvale, California
Employees501–1,000201–500
FundingSeries A · $106M raisedLater Stage VC · $1M raised
Best forFounders, startups and teams that want to build and launch web and mobile apps without writing codeTeams that want custom business apps built without writing code, from small businesses to large enterprises

Plans side by side

Bubble

Free$0month
Starter$32month, billed annually
Growth$119month, billed annually
Team$349month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcontact us
Bubble pricing

Claris FileMaker

Starter (Formerly Essentials)$22per user, per month, billed annually
Max (Formerly Standard)$45per user, per month, billed annually
Claris FileMaker pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Bubble

  • Powerful visual full-stack web app builder
  • Best for customer-facing web apps and SaaS MVPs
  • Free tier useful for learning and prototyping
  • Annual billing saves up to 20%
  • Fast MVP speed and workflow flexibility
  • Free tier limited to development and testing; live publishing and custom domains need a paid plan
  • Less suited to heavily governed enterprise systems
  • Less portability and deep architectural control

Claris FileMaker

Profile in progress.

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Bubble vs Claris FileMaker”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/bubble-vs-claris-filemaker, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.