Bubble vs Quickbase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Bubble is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 23 versus 4 for Quickbase, and ranks ahead in 20% of the answers that name both.
Choose Bubble if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (23 vs 4)
- AI answers describe it more positively (36% vs 13% positive)
- You need GDPR support coverage
- Powerful visual full-stack web app builder
Choose Quickbase if…
- You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 3 or HIPAA Security Rule or DFARS CSA CCM STAR Level 2 or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
- Recognised among established low-code platforms
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Bubble | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 23% | 4% |
| Change vs last week | up+0.1% | down−0.4% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #5 | #25 |
| Share of voice | 5.3% | 1.3% |
| Mentions this run | 32 | 8 |
| Positive in AI answers | 36% | 13% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Bubble 0pp · Quickbase −0.40000000000000036pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Bubble leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
5 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Bubble | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to the most popular low-code platform | Perplexity | #12 | #9 |
| How much does a low-code platform cost per month? | ChatGPT | #6 | #5 |
| Which low-code platform offers a free trial? | ChatGPT | #5 | #4 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | ChatGPT | #17 | #12 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | Perplexity | #12 | #13 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Bubble | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $32 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Bubble-hosted cloud platform; enterprise customers can get a dedicated instance on AWS with a choice of region | — |
| Integrations | — | 40+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR support | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, HIPAA Security Rule, DFARS CSA CCM STAR Level 2, TX-RAMP Level 2 |
| Support | Community forum, Dedicated support team on Enterprise plan | Expert support, Partners and services, Active community champions, Training and best practices for a Center of Excellence |
| Founded | 2012 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | New York, NY, United States | Boston, Massachusetts |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Series A · $106M raised | Funding round |
| Best for | Founders, startups and teams that want to build and launch web and mobile apps without writing code | Business teams that need custom apps for complex projects, processes and field operations without writing code. |
Plans side by side
Bubble
Quickbase
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Bubble
- Powerful visual full-stack web app builder
- Best for customer-facing web apps and SaaS MVPs
- Free tier useful for learning and prototyping
- Annual billing saves up to 20%
- Fast MVP speed and workflow flexibility
- Free tier limited to development and testing; live publishing and custom domains need a paid plan
- Less suited to heavily governed enterprise systems
- Less portability and deep architectural control
Quickbase
- Recognised among established low-code platforms
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Bubble vs Quickbase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/bubble-vs-quickbase, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.