BudibaseBuild AI agents, chat and automate internal workflows instantly.
vs
MakeAI automation you can visually build and orchestrate in real time.
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
Budibase vs Make
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Make is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 6.3 versus 5.2 for Budibase.
Choose Budibase if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 41% positive)
- open-source, self-hosted deployment
- avoids vendor lock-in and keeps data ownership
- transparent, predictable pricing
Choose Make if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.3 vs 5.2)
- You need GDPR or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Budibase | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.2% | 6.3% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.5% | down−7.8% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #20 | #16 |
| Share of voice | 1.6% | 2.3% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 13 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 41% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Budibase −0.5pp · Make −7.8pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Make leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
BudibaseMake
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Budibase ranked higher
0Make ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Budibase | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $19 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Self-host on your own infrastructure or use Budibase Cloud | Cloud, hosted on Amazon AWS |
| Integrations | — | 3500+ |
| Compliance | ISO 27001 | GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001 |
| Support | Community forum, docs and chat, Email support on Business plan, Priority SLAs and account manager on Enterprise | Help center, Community forum, 24/7 support on Enterprise plans, Dedicated support team on Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2019 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Belfast, Northern Ireland | Prague, Czech Republic |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Seed (about $1.8M, before Seed II) · $9M raised | — |
| Best for | IT and operations teams in regulated organizations that want agents, apps and automations they can self-host. | Teams and organizations deploying AI and automation across the business, from a single department to company-wide. |
Plans side by side
Budibase
Pro$19month
Premium$49month
Business$299month
Enterprise (Cloud)Customcustom
Open source$0free (self-host)
Enterprise (Self-host)Customcustom
Make
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Budibase
- open-source, self-hosted deployment
- avoids vendor lock-in and keeps data ownership
- transparent, predictable pricing
- free with no user limit
- low-code tool for internal tools, admin panels and dashboards
Make
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
- Visual, no-code automation between existing apps
- Integrations with more than 3,000 apps
- Built-in AI agents for business workflows
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Budibase vs Make”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/budibase-vs-make, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.