CeloxisEnterprise project and portfolio management in one execution platform.
vs
HarvestEveryone's time is valuable. We help teams spend it wisely.
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Celoxis vs Harvest
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Celoxis is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 4.6 versus 2.7 for Harvest, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Celoxis if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.6 vs 2.7)
- You need more native integrations (400+ vs 40+)
- You need ISO 27001 or AICPA SOC 2 Type 2 or EU GDPR or UK GDPR coverage
- Portfolio planning and scenario analysis
Choose Harvest if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need PCI-DSS Merchant Certificate coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Celoxis | Harvest |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.6% | 2.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #17 | #29 |
| Share of voice | 1.5% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 25% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Celoxis 0pp · Harvest 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Celoxis leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CeloxisHarvest
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0Celoxis ranked higher
1Harvest ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Celoxis | Harvest |
|---|---|---|---|
| What should a project management tool integrate with? | Perplexity | #8 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Celoxis | Harvest |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $10 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $9 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud or on-premise | — |
| Integrations | 400+ | 40+ |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, AICPA SOC 2 Type 2, EU GDPR, UK GDPR | PCI-DSS Merchant Certificate |
| Support | 24x5 support with real people, Standard, Premium and VIP support tiers by plan, Dedicated account manager through rollout | Help Center, Scheduled phone support on Teams and Enterprise plans, Dedicated Customer Success Manager on Enterprise Plus |
| Founded | 2001 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | Pune, India | — |
| Employees | 51–200 | — |
| Funding | — | Seed |
| Best for | PMOs and project-driven teams that need to manage portfolios, resources, budgets and risks together. | Freelancers and professional services teams that bill clients by the hour, from solo users to larger teams. |
Plans side by side
Celoxis
Core$10per Standard user per month, billed annually
Essentials$25per Standard user per month, billed annually
Professional$35per Standard user per month, billed annually
Business$45per Standard user per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing
Harvest
Free$0forever, 1 seat
Teams$9per seat per month, billed annually
Enterprise$14per seat per month, billed annually
Enterprise PlusCustomcustom pricing
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Celoxis
- Portfolio planning and scenario analysis
- Strong ratings in some comparison research
Harvest
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Celoxis vs Harvest”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/celoxis-vs-harvest, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.