CheckmkUnified IT Observability for the Hybrid World
vs
New RelicIntelligent Observability resolves issues at scale before they impact your bottom line.
Comparison · Observability · weekly run Nov 3
Checkmk vs New Relic
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
New Relic is the stronger AI pick in Observability: it has a visibility score of 47.1 versus 0 for Checkmk.
Choose Checkmk if…
- You need more native integrations (2000+ vs 800+)
- You need SOC 2 Type I coverage
Choose New Relic if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (47.1 vs 0)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or FedRAMP Moderate (eligible accounts) or HIPAA eligibility or ISO 42001 AI certification coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Generous permanent free tier with 100 GB monthly ingest
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Checkmk | New Relic |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 47.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Observability | #38 | #3 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 10.7% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 63 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 42% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Checkmk 0pp · New Relic 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
New Relic leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CheckmkNew Relic
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Checkmk ranked higher
0New Relic ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Checkmk | New Relic |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $10 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Self-hosted or SaaS (Checkmk Cloud) | Cloud-based SaaS |
| Integrations | 2000+ | 800+ |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type I | SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP Moderate (eligible accounts), HIPAA eligibility, ISO 27001, ISO 42001 AI certification |
| Support | Checkmk Forum (Community), Professional support 8h x 5d (Pro), Professional support 10h x 5d (Ultimate, Cloud), Premium support 24h x 5d (add-on) | Ticketed support, 2-hour critical initial response SLA on Pro, 1-hour critical initial response SLA and priority ticket routing on Enterprise |
| Founded | 2007 | 2008 |
| Headquarters | Munich, Germany | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Strategic investment from PSG Equity | Post-IPO raise (not corroborated by other sources) |
| Best for | Growing enterprises, managed service providers and global enterprises that run hybrid IT and need full-stack monitoring | Engineers responsible for application and system uptime and reliability, and teams that want full-stack observability starting from a free tier. |
Plans side by side
Checkmk
Pricing not available.
New Relic
Free$0per month, one full platform user and 100 GB ingest
Standard$10per first full platform user/month; $99 per additional user (max 5)
Pro$349per full platform user/month (annual commitment); $418.80 monthly pay as you go
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Checkmk
Profile in progress.
New Relic
- Generous permanent free tier with 100 GB monthly ingest
- Easy setup and quick APM start with minimal upfront cost
- Unified, consumption-based pricing model
- Strong full-stack observability platform and APM pioneer
- Value and accessibility with AI-assisted querying and diagnostics
- Costs can surprise as log and trace volume scales
- Pricing requires careful cost governance and depends on usage
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Checkmk vs New Relic”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/checkmk-vs-new-relic, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.