Skip to content
SlateIndex
ChronosphereWith the only cloud native observability platform that puts you in control, the road to remediation just got shorter.
vs
New RelicIntelligent Observability resolves issues at scale before they impact your bottom line.
Comparison · Observability · weekly run Nov 3

Chronosphere vs New Relic

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

New Relic is the stronger AI pick in Observability: it has a visibility score of 47.1 versus 2.5 for Chronosphere, and ranks ahead in 86% of the answers that name both.

Choose Chronosphere if…

  • Named among analyst-recommended observability vendors

Choose New Relic if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (47.1 vs 2.5)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (42% vs 14% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or FedRAMP Moderate (eligible accounts) or HIPAA eligibility or ISO 27001 or ISO 42001 AI certification coverage
  • Generous permanent free tier with 100 GB monthly ingest

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Chronosphere New Relic
Visibility score2.5%47.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Observability#21#3
Share of voice1.2%10.7%
Mentions this run763
Positive in AI answers14%42%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Chronosphere 3%

Chronosphere 0pp · New Relic 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

New Relic leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
3.3%
51.3%
AI Mode
0.9%
43.9%
Perplexity
3.1%
46.1%
ChronosphereNew Relic

Head to head in AI answers

7 engine answers name both brands

1Chronosphere ranked higher
6New Relic ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionChronosphereNew Relic
Pricing model—Usage-based
Entry price—Free; paid from $10 / mo
Free plan—Yes
Deployment—Cloud-based SaaS
Integrations—800+
Compliance—SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP Moderate (eligible accounts), HIPAA eligibility, ISO 27001, ISO 42001 AI certification
Support—Ticketed support, 2-hour critical initial response SLA on Pro, 1-hour critical initial response SLA and priority ticket routing on Enterprise
Founded—2008
Headquarters—San Francisco, CA, United States
Employees—1,001–5,000
FundingSeries C (reported March 2024) · $343M raisedPost-IPO raise (not corroborated by other sources)
Best forTeams running microservices and containers on Kubernetes that want control over observability cost and complexity.Engineers responsible for application and system uptime and reliability, and teams that want full-stack observability starting from a free tier.

Plans side by side

Chronosphere

Pricing not available.

New Relic

Free$0per month, one full platform user and 100 GB ingest
Standard$10per first full platform user/month; $99 per additional user (max 5)
Pro$349per full platform user/month (annual commitment); $418.80 monthly pay as you go
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
New Relic pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Chronosphere

  • Named among analyst-recommended observability vendors

    New Relic

    • Generous permanent free tier with 100 GB monthly ingest
    • Easy setup and quick APM start with minimal upfront cost
    • Unified, consumption-based pricing model
    • Strong full-stack observability platform and APM pioneer
    • Value and accessibility with AI-assisted querying and diagnostics
    • Costs can surprise as log and trace volume scales
    • Pricing requires careful cost governance and depends on usage

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Chronosphere vs New Relic”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/chronosphere-vs-new-relic, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.