Claris FileMakerBuild custom apps, automate work, and integrate systems
vs
MakeAI automation you can visually build and orchestrate in real time.
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
Claris FileMaker vs Make
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Make is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 6.3 versus 1.6 for Claris FileMaker.
Choose Claris FileMaker if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
Choose Make if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.3 vs 1.6)
- You need GDPR or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or ISO 27001 coverage
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Claris FileMaker | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.6% | 6.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | down−7.8% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #37 | #16 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 2.3% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 13 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 41% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Claris FileMaker +1.6pp · Make −7.8pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Make leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Claris FileMakerMake
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Claris FileMaker ranked higher
0Make ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Claris FileMaker | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $22 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Cloud (FileMaker Cloud on AWS) or self-hosted (FileMaker Server) | Cloud, hosted on Amazon AWS |
| Integrations | — | 3500+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27018 | GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001 |
| Support | Technical support from Claris teams, Around-the-clock monitoring by Claris teams, Claris Academy certifications, Online community forums | Help center, Community forum, 24/7 support on Enterprise plans, Dedicated support team on Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2019 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, California | Prague, Czech Republic |
| Employees | 201–500 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Later Stage VC · $1M raised | — |
| Best for | Teams that want custom business apps built without writing code, from small businesses to large enterprises | Teams and organizations deploying AI and automation across the business, from a single department to company-wide. |
Plans side by side
Claris FileMaker
Starter (Formerly Essentials)$22per user, per month, billed annually
Max (Formerly Standard)$45per user, per month, billed annually
Make
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Claris FileMaker
Profile in progress.
Make
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
- Visual, no-code automation between existing apps
- Integrations with more than 3,000 apps
- Built-in AI agents for business workflows
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Claris FileMaker vs Make”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/claris-filemaker-vs-make, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.