Claris FileMaker vs Retool
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Retool is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 29.9 versus 1.6 for Claris FileMaker, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Claris FileMaker if…
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
Choose Retool if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (29.9 vs 1.6)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 coverage
- Excellent for internal tools, admin panels, and dashboards
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Claris FileMaker | Retool |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.6% | 29.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | down−4% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #37 | #4 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 7.8% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 46 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 41% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Claris FileMaker +1.6pp · Retool −4pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Retool leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Claris FileMaker | Retool |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which low-code platform offers a free trial? | ChatGPT | #7 | #6 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Claris FileMaker | Retool |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $22 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (FileMaker Cloud on AWS) or self-hosted (FileMaker Server) | Retool Cloud, self-hosted, or air-gapped |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27018 | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 |
| Support | Technical support from Claris teams, Around-the-clock monitoring by Claris teams, Claris Academy certifications, Online community forums | — |
| Founded | 2019 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, California | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Later Stage VC · $1M raised | Series C2 · $141M raised |
| Best for | Teams that want custom business apps built without writing code, from small businesses to large enterprises | Enterprises and business teams that want to build internal tools with AI while IT keeps governance, security review and audit trails. |
Plans side by side
Claris FileMaker
Retool
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Claris FileMaker
Profile in progress.
Retool
- Excellent for internal tools, admin panels, and dashboards
- Developer-first low-code platform
- Transparent, inexpensive pricing
- High developer satisfaction ratings
- Rapid assembly of internal tools
- Pricing rises as builders and users increase
- Overkill for simple apps or lightweight needs
- Free plan limits on users, workflow runs, and storage
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Claris FileMaker vs Retool”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/claris-filemaker-vs-retool, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.