ClayBuild systems to grow revenue
vs
GumloopBuild AI agents for work
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Clay vs Gumloop
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Gumloop is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 4.9 versus 0.7 for Clay.
Choose Clay if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need ISO 27001 or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Gumloop if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.9 vs 0.7)
- You want a lower entry price ($37 vs $167)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
- visual node-based canvas for chaining AI agents
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Clay | Gumloop |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.7% | 4.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #65 | #24 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 1.6% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 10 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Clay 0pp · Gumloop 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Gumloop leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ClayGumloop
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Clay ranked higher
0Gumloop ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Clay | Gumloop |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $167 / mo | $37 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-based, with VPC deployment inside a customer's AWS, Azure or Google Cloud environment. |
| Integrations | — | 400+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR |
| Support | Priority support queue on Growth plan, Dedicated Slack channel on Enterprise plan, Dedicated growth strategist on Enterprise plan | Email support, Dedicated Slack support on Enterprise, Gumloop University, Embedded Gumloop Expert on Enterprise |
| Founded | 2017 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series B Expansion | Series B · $70M raised |
| Best for | GTM engineers and revenue teams that build their own prospecting, enrichment and outbound workflows. | Companies whose non-technical teams want to build their own agents while IT keeps control of access and spend. |
Plans side by side
Clay
Free$0month
Launch$167month (starting price as shown; monthly from $185 per FAQ)
Growth$446month (starting price as shown; monthly from $495 per FAQ)
EnterpriseCustomcustom, annual commitment
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Clay
Profile in progress.
Gumloop
- visual node-based canvas for chaining AI agents
- web scraping and data extraction capabilities
- 14-day trial offered
- suggested as a starting option for teams without engineering capacity
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clay vs Gumloop”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clay-vs-gumloop, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.