ClayBuild systems to grow revenue
vs
Microsoft AutoGenOpen-source framework for building and coordinating multi-agent AI applications
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Clay vs Microsoft AutoGen
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Microsoft AutoGen is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 4.5 versus 0.7 for Clay.
Choose Clay if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
Choose Microsoft AutoGen if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.5 vs 0.7)
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- high-concurrency asynchronous multi-agent conversations
- enterprise-grade scaling
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Clay | Microsoft AutoGen |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.7% | 4.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #65 | #26 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 1.2% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Clay 0pp · Microsoft AutoGen 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Microsoft AutoGen leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ClayMicrosoft AutoGen
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Clay ranked higher
0Microsoft AutoGen ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Clay | Microsoft AutoGen |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $167 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | — | Open-source Python library |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA | — |
| Support | Priority support queue on Growth plan, Dedicated Slack channel on Enterprise plan, Dedicated growth strategist on Enterprise plan | — |
| Founded | 2017 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | Redmond, Washington (parent: Microsoft) |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Series B Expansion | — |
| Best for | GTM engineers and revenue teams that build their own prospecting, enrichment and outbound workflows. | — |
Plans side by side
Clay
Free$0month
Launch$167month (starting price as shown; monthly from $185 per FAQ)
Growth$446month (starting price as shown; monthly from $495 per FAQ)
EnterpriseCustomcustom, annual commitment
Microsoft AutoGen
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Clay
Profile in progress.
Microsoft AutoGen
- high-concurrency asynchronous multi-agent conversations
- enterprise-grade scaling
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clay vs Microsoft AutoGen”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clay-vs-microsoft-autogen, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.