ClayBuild systems to grow revenue
vs
RasaBuild agents your company brags about
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Clay vs Rasa
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Rasa is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 2.4 versus 0.7 for Clay.
Choose Clay if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Rasa if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.4 vs 0.7)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Clay | Rasa |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.7% | 2.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #65 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Clay 0pp · Rasa 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Rasa leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ClayRasa
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Clay ranked higher
0Rasa ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Clay | Rasa |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $167 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | — | Self-managed on-premises or private cloud, or managed service |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA | — |
| Support | Priority support queue on Growth plan, Dedicated Slack channel on Enterprise plan, Dedicated growth strategist on Enterprise plan | Free community support in the forum, Basic support via online portal with best-effort response during business hours, Premium Support with 24/7/365 response, Customer Success Manager and business reviews |
| Founded | 2017 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series B Expansion | Series C · $70M raised |
| Best for | GTM engineers and revenue teams that build their own prospecting, enrichment and outbound workflows. | Product teams in regulated enterprises that want engineers and business teams to build customer-facing AI agents on one codebase |
Plans side by side
Clay
Free$0month
Launch$167month (starting price as shown; monthly from $185 per FAQ)
Growth$446month (starting price as shown; monthly from $495 per FAQ)
EnterpriseCustomcustom, annual commitment
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clay vs Rasa”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clay-vs-rasa, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.