Clay vs SmartReach.io
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
SmartReach.io is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 3.3 versus 2.9 for Clay, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Clay if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose SmartReach.io if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.3 vs 2.9)
- You want a lower entry price ($29 vs $167)
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 33% positive)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Clay | SmartReach.io |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.9% | 3.3% |
| Change vs last week | down−1.5% | up+2.3% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #25 | #24 |
| Share of voice | 1.2% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Clay −1.5000000000000004pp · SmartReach.io +2.3pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
SmartReach.io leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Clay | SmartReach.io |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which sales engagement platform offers a free trial? | Perplexity | #13 | #2 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Clay | SmartReach.io |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $167 / mo | $29 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-hosted SaaS |
| Integrations | — | 8000+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA | — |
| Support | Priority support queue on Growth plan, Dedicated Slack channel on Enterprise plan, Dedicated growth strategist on Enterprise plan | Help, Chat, On-call and screenshare support on higher tiers, Dedicated Success Manager on higher tiers |
| Founded | 2017 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | Hyderabad, Telangana, India |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series B Expansion | Pre-seed · $0M raised |
| Best for | GTM engineers and revenue teams that build their own prospecting, enrichment and outbound workflows. | Sales teams and agencies running cold email outreach at scale across several channels. |
Plans side by side
Clay
SmartReach.io
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Clay
Profile in progress.
SmartReach.io
- No per-seat charges
- 14-day free trial
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clay vs SmartReach.io”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clay-vs-smartreach-io, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.