ClayBuild systems to grow revenue
vs
TaskadeOne prompt. One live app.
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Clay vs Taskade
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Taskade is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 4 versus 0.7 for Clay.
Choose Clay if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Taskade if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4 vs 0.7)
- You want a lower entry price ($6 vs $167)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
- Best suited for AI-native multi-agent systems
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Clay | Taskade |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.7% | 4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #65 | #27 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Clay 0pp · Taskade 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Taskade leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ClayTaskade
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Clay ranked higher
0Taskade ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Clay | Taskade |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $167 / mo | Free; paid from $6 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-hosted SaaS; Taskade hosts every published app with hosting and a database included |
| Integrations | — | 168+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA | — |
| Support | Priority support queue on Growth plan, Dedicated Slack channel on Enterprise plan, Dedicated growth strategist on Enterprise plan | Priority support with senior engineers (Business plan), Premium support with SLAs and onboarding (Enterprise plan) |
| Founded | 2017 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series B Expansion | Seed, undisclosed, reported as led by TRAC (not confirmed by other sources) · $5M raised |
| Best for | GTM engineers and revenue teams that build their own prospecting, enrichment and outbound workflows. | Operators and small teams who need custom business apps such as CRMs, trackers and client portals without coding, and agencies that build for clients on the Business plan |
Plans side by side
Clay
Free$0month
Launch$167month (starting price as shown; monthly from $185 per FAQ)
Growth$446month (starting price as shown; monthly from $495 per FAQ)
EnterpriseCustomcustom, annual commitment
Taskade
Free$0per month, billed monthly
Starter$6per month, or $72 billed yearly, 3 users
Pro$10per month, or $120 billed yearly, 10 users
Business$25per month, or $300 billed yearly, unlimited users
Max$100per month, or $1,200 billed yearly, unlimited users
EnterpriseCustomcustom, contact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Clay
Profile in progress.
Taskade
- Best suited for AI-native multi-agent systems
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clay vs Taskade”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clay-vs-taskade, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.