ClayBuild systems to grow revenue
vs
UiPathBusiness orchestration and automation for AI agents, robots, and people
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Clay vs UiPath
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
UiPath is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 3.5 versus 0.7 for Clay.
Choose Clay if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose UiPath if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.5 vs 0.7)
- You want a lower entry price ($25 vs $167)
- AI answers describe it more positively (38% vs 33% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Clay | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.7% | 3.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #65 | #28 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 1.3% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 9 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 38% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Clay 0pp · UiPath 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
UiPath leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ClayUiPath
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Clay ranked higher
0UiPath ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Clay | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $167 / mo | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | — | Cloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5 |
| Support | Priority support queue on Growth plan, Dedicated Slack channel on Enterprise plan, Dedicated growth strategist on Enterprise plan | Bronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum |
| Founded | 2017 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series B Expansion | IPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised |
| Best for | GTM engineers and revenue teams that build their own prospecting, enrichment and outbound workflows. | Large enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform |
Plans side by side
Clay
Free$0month
Launch$167month (starting price as shown; monthly from $185 per FAQ)
Growth$446month (starting price as shown; monthly from $495 per FAQ)
EnterpriseCustomcustom, annual commitment
UiPath
Community$0free forever
Basic$25per month (starting at)
StandardCustomcontact sales
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Clay
Profile in progress.
UiPath
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
- Fast implementation times compared with peers
- Rated Exemplary by ISG
- Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
- Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clay vs UiPath”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clay-vs-uipath, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.