Close vs Less Annoying CRM
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Close is the stronger AI pick in CRM: it has a visibility score of 7.3 versus 5 for Less Annoying CRM, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Close if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.3 vs 5)
- AI answers describe it more positively (52% vs 38% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
Choose Less Annoying CRM if…
- You want a lower entry price ($15 vs $19)
- You need HIPAA (BAA available) coverage
- Straightforward pricing without a complicated tier structure
- Best for absolute simplicity and solopreneurs
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Close | Less Annoying CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 7.3% | 5% |
| Change vs last week | down−1% | down−1.9% |
| Rank in CRM | #10 | #16 |
| Share of voice | 2.3% | 1.6% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 8 |
| Positive in AI answers | 52% | 38% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Close −0.8999999999999995pp · Less Annoying CRM −1.9000000000000004pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Close leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Close | Less Annoying CRM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which CRM tools offer annual discounts? | Perplexity | #7 | #16 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Close | Less Annoying CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $19 per seat / mo | $15 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No · 30-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (hosted on AWS) |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA | HIPAA (BAA available) |
| Support | Knowledge base, Email support | Email, Phone, Help center, Free coaching calls |
| Founded | 2013 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, United States | St. Louis, Missouri |
| Employees | 51–200 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Angel | Grant (Arch Grants) |
| Best for | Founders, small businesses and sales teams that sell through calls, email and SMS | Small businesses and solo users who have outgrown a spreadsheet but want a simple CRM. |
Plans side by side
Close
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Close
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
- Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
- All-in-one calling, SMS, and email cadences
- Strong customer satisfaction in recent reviews
- Frequently included in CRM shortlists
Less Annoying CRM
- Straightforward pricing without a complicated tier structure
- Best for absolute simplicity and solopreneurs
- Simple contact and lead management with fewer unnecessary features
- Highest average user-review rating of 4.86/5
- Ease of use and transparent pricing
- Rating based on only 57 reviews
- Less advanced automation than rivals
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Close vs Less Annoying CRM”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/close-vs-less-annoying-crm, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.