CloseThe CRM that does the work
vs
NooksRevenue infrastructure for reps and agents
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3
Close vs Nooks
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Nooks is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 7.2 versus 2.8 for Close, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Close if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
- Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
- All-in-one calling, SMS, and email cadences
Choose Nooks if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.2 vs 2.8)
- AI answers describe it more positively (54% vs 52% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or SOC 3 or EU-US DPF coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Close | Nooks |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.8% | 7.2% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.6% | up+3.7% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #26 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 1% | 1.7% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 9 |
| Positive in AI answers | 52% | 54% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Close −0.5pp · Nooks +3.7pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Nooks leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CloseNooks
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1Close ranked higher
0Nooks ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Close | Nooks |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Sales Engagement tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #9 | #10 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Close | Nooks |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $19 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | — |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | — |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 3, EU-US DPF |
| Support | Knowledge base, Email support | — |
| Founded | 2013 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, United States | San Francisco, California |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Angel | Series B · $70M raised |
| Best for | Founders, small businesses and sales teams that sell through calls, email and SMS | Revenue teams running outbound, inbound and deal management |
Plans side by side
Close
Solo$19per user / month (billed monthly; $9 billed annually)
Essentials$49per user / month (billed monthly; $35 billed annually)
Growth$109per user / month (billed monthly; $99 billed annually)
Scale$149per user / month (billed monthly; $139 billed annually)
Nooks
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Close
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
- Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
- All-in-one calling, SMS, and email cadences
- Strong customer satisfaction in recent reviews
- Frequently included in CRM shortlists
Nooks
- AI-native platform combining sequencing, dialing, prospecting, and AI coaching
- Unified workflow replacing multi-tool sales stacks
- Suited to large organizations linking rep engagement data to revenue forecasting
- Highest-rated specialist sales engagement platform
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Close vs Nooks”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/close-vs-nooks, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.