CloseThe CRM that does the work
vs
SmartReach.ioEnd-to-end cold email software, plus LinkedIn and calls.
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3
Close vs SmartReach.io
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
SmartReach.io is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 3.3 versus 2.8 for Close.
Choose Close if…
- You want a lower entry price ($19 vs $29)
- AI answers describe it more positively (52% vs 50% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
Choose SmartReach.io if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.3 vs 2.8)
- You need more native integrations (8000+ vs 100+)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- No per-seat charges
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Close | SmartReach.io |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.8% | 3.3% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.6% | up+2.3% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #26 | #24 |
| Share of voice | 1% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 52% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Close −0.5pp · SmartReach.io +2.3pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
SmartReach.io leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CloseSmartReach.io
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Close ranked higher
0SmartReach.io ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Close | SmartReach.io |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $19 per seat / mo | $29 / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud-hosted SaaS |
| Integrations | 100+ | 8000+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA | — |
| Support | Knowledge base, Email support | Help, Chat, On-call and screenshare support on higher tiers, Dedicated Success Manager on higher tiers |
| Founded | 2013 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, United States | Hyderabad, Telangana, India |
| Employees | 51–200 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Angel | Pre-seed · $0M raised |
| Best for | Founders, small businesses and sales teams that sell through calls, email and SMS | Sales teams and agencies running cold email outreach at scale across several channels. |
Plans side by side
Close
Solo$19per user / month (billed monthly; $9 billed annually)
Essentials$49per user / month (billed monthly; $35 billed annually)
Growth$109per user / month (billed monthly; $99 billed annually)
Scale$149per user / month (billed monthly; $139 billed annually)
SmartReach.io
Email Outreach Basic$29month
Email Outreach Plus$89month
Email Outreach Pro$199month
Email Outreach Scale$499month
Sales Engagement Basic$39month
Sales Engagement Plus$99month
Sales Engagement Pro$249month
Sales Engagement Scale$599month
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Close
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
- Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
- All-in-one calling, SMS, and email cadences
- Strong customer satisfaction in recent reviews
- Frequently included in CRM shortlists
SmartReach.io
- No per-seat charges
- 14-day free trial
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Close vs SmartReach.io”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/close-vs-smartreach-io, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.