ConcordContract Management You Don't Have to Manage
vs
Conga CPQProposals & Contracts
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
Concord vs Conga CPQ
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Concord is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 3.6 versus 0.3 for Conga CPQ.
Choose Concord if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.6 vs 0.3)
- You need EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework with UK and Swiss extensions or GDPR or CSA STAR Level One coverage
- free contract-focused tier with unlimited contracts and e-signatures
Choose Conga CPQ if…
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or PCI DSS or HIPAA coverage
- handles complex products, pricing, discounts, configuration and approval rules
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Concord | Conga CPQ |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.6% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #20 | #44 |
| Share of voice | 1.1% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 100% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Concord 0pp · Conga CPQ 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Concord leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ConcordConga CPQ
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Concord ranked higher
0Conga CPQ ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Concord | Conga CPQ |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $499 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Cloud-based | Cloud SaaS, mainly as a Salesforce-native application |
| Integrations | 5000+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework with UK and Swiss extensions, GDPR, CSA STAR Level One | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, PCI DSS, HIPAA |
| Support | Self-serve knowledge base, Email support, Live training webinars, Priority customer support | — |
| Founded | 2014 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, US | Houston, Texas |
| Employees | 51–200 | — |
| Funding | Later-stage VC · $39M raised | Round led by Insight Venture Partners and Salesforce Ventures |
| Best for | Mid-sized companies in healthcare, tech, professional services and financial services, especially those where business teams create and track contracts outside legal. | Mid-market and enterprise buyers |
Plans side by side
Concord
Essentials$499month (paid annually), includes 5 users
Business$899month (paid annually), includes 5 users
Enterprise$1,299month (paid annually), includes 5 users
Conga CPQ
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Concord
- free contract-focused tier with unlimited contracts and e-signatures
- less proposal-oriented
Conga CPQ
- handles complex products, pricing, discounts, configuration and approval rules
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Concord vs Conga CPQ”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/concord-vs-conga-cpq, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.