Contentsquare vs Fathom Analytics
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Fathom Analytics is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 14.6 versus 6.7 for Contentsquare, and ranks ahead in 33% of the answers that name both.
Choose Contentsquare if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO/IEC 27701 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 9001:2015 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Automatic event capture (autocapture) with no manual tagging
Choose Fathom Analytics if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (14.6 vs 6.7)
- You want a lower entry price ($15 vs $49)
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 33% positive)
- You need GDPR or CCPA or ePrivacy or PECR coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Contentsquare | Fathom Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 6.7% | 14.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Web Analytics | #14 | #8 |
| Share of voice | 2.5% | 4% |
| Mentions this run | 13 | 20 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Contentsquare 0pp · Fathom Analytics 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Fathom Analytics leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
6 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Contentsquare | Fathom Analytics |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Web Analytics tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #10 | #11 |
| Compare the leading Web Analytics platforms | Perplexity | #8 | #10 |
| Alternatives to the most popular web analytics tool | Perplexity | #13 | #4 |
| Which Web Analytics vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #10 | #9 |
| Which Web Analytics tools offer annual discounts? | ChatGPT | #1 | #2 |
| Official website of the top web analytics tool vendors | ChatGPT | #9 | #12 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Contentsquare | Fathom Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $49 / mo | $15 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 7-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Hosted software-as-a-service |
| Integrations | 115+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO/IEC 27701, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 9001:2015 | GDPR, CCPA, ePrivacy, PECR |
| Support | AI-powered support on the Free plan, Priority support on Pro and Enterprise, Dedicated support and SLAs on Enterprise, Dedicated customer success manager on Enterprise | Email support, Help centre |
| Founded | 2012 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | Victoria, British Columbia, Canada |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 1–10 |
| Funding | Series F | Bootstrapped |
| Best for | Digital teams at large enterprise and mid-market brands that want to understand and improve journeys across web and apps. The Free plan suits first-time users, and Enterprise suits large teams. | European companies and agencies that want website analytics without cookies or personal data collection. |
Plans side by side
Contentsquare
Fathom Analytics
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Contentsquare
- Automatic event capture (autocapture) with no manual tagging
- Session replay and UX friction insights
- Strong G2 rating from many reviews
- Recognised market leader in digital experience analytics
- Free tier available for small projects
- Paid plans require custom quotes rather than transparent pricing
Fathom Analytics
- privacy-focused, cookie-free analytics
- simple dashboard and simple metrics
- fast and reliable
- predictable flat-rate pricing based on pageviews
- lightweight tool suited to small sites
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Contentsquare vs Fathom Analytics”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/contentsquare-vs-fathom-analytics, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.