Creatio vs Microsoft Power Apps
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Microsoft Power Apps is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 55.6 versus 3.5 for Creatio, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Creatio if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (45% vs 44% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or SOC 2 Type II coverage
- low-code process automation
- workflow automation combined with CRM
Choose Microsoft Power Apps if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (55.6 vs 3.5)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
- Most widely used low-code platform by adoption
- Strong integration with Microsoft 365, Teams, Azure and Dataverse
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Creatio | Microsoft Power Apps |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.5% | 55.6% |
| Change vs last week | up+0.8% | up+0.2% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #28 | #1 |
| Share of voice | 1.7% | 9.8% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 55 |
| Positive in AI answers | 45% | 44% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Creatio +0.7999999999999998pp · Microsoft Power Apps +0.30000000000000426pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Microsoft Power Apps leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
8 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Creatio | Microsoft Power Apps |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Low-Code & No-Code tools in 2026? | AI Mode | #6 | #1 |
| Compare the leading Low-Code & No-Code platforms | AI Mode | #7 | #3 |
| Which Low-Code & No-Code vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #8 | #1 |
| Which Low-Code & No-Code vendors do analysts recommend? | AI Mode | #9 | #1 |
| Which Low-Code & No-Code vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #8 | #1 |
| Which low-code platform has transparent pricing? | Perplexity | #10 | #1 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | ChatGPT | #9 | #1 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | Perplexity | #10 | #1 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Creatio | Microsoft Power Apps |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Cloud | Microsoft Cloud, as part of Power Platform |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2 Type 2 |
| Support | Support plans, Academy, Partner network | Documentation, Power Apps Learn, Power Apps Support, Power Apps Community |
| Founded | 2014 | — |
| Headquarters | Boston, Massachusetts, USA | Redmond, Washington |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | — |
| Funding | Series D (unconfirmed) · $268M raised | — |
| Best for | Mid-size and enterprise organizations, especially in financial services, wanting CRM with no-code workflow and AI agents | Organizations whose business users and professional developers need to build and govern internal business apps together |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Creatio
- low-code process automation
- workflow automation combined with CRM
- best for agile process-driven enterprises
- configurable workflows and process automation
- accessible composable pricing bundling workflow and CRM
Microsoft Power Apps
- Most widely used low-code platform by adoption
- Strong integration with Microsoft 365, Teams, Azure and Dataverse
- Strong default for Microsoft-centric enterprises and citizen developers
- Transparent, publicly listed pricing
- Free developer plan and trial for testing
- Pricing for premium connectors and services can be unclear
- Can be overkill for simple apps versus cheaper tools
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Creatio vs Microsoft Power Apps”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/creatio-vs-microsoft-power-apps, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.