Creatio vs UiPath
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Creatio is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 3.5 versus 2.4 for UiPath, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Creatio if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.5 vs 2.4)
- AI answers describe it more positively (45% vs 38% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or SOC 2 Type II coverage
- low-code process automation
Choose UiPath if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO 9001:2015 or HITRUST or HIPAA or C5 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Creatio | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.5% | 2.4% |
| Change vs last week | up+0.8% | up+1.8% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #28 | #33 |
| Share of voice | 1.7% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 45% | 38% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Creatio +0.7999999999999998pp · UiPath +1.7999999999999998pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Creatio leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Creatio | UiPath |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which Low-Code & No-Code vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #8 | #9 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | ChatGPT | #9 | #14 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Creatio | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2 Type II | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5 |
| Support | Support plans, Academy, Partner network | Bronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum |
| Founded | 2014 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | Boston, Massachusetts, USA | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series D (unconfirmed) · $268M raised | IPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised |
| Best for | Mid-size and enterprise organizations, especially in financial services, wanting CRM with no-code workflow and AI agents | Large enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform |
Plans side by side
Creatio
Pricing not available.
UiPath
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Creatio
- low-code process automation
- workflow automation combined with CRM
- best for agile process-driven enterprises
- configurable workflows and process automation
- accessible composable pricing bundling workflow and CRM
UiPath
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
- Fast implementation times compared with peers
- Rated Exemplary by ISG
- Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
- Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Creatio vs UiPath”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/creatio-vs-uipath, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.