CyberArkUnified IAM, PAM, and IGA identity security platform.
vs
OmadaA Leader In Identity Governance and Administration
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
CyberArk vs Omada
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
CyberArk is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 15.6 versus 0.6 for Omada, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose CyberArk if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (15.6 vs 0.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (49% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or ISO 9001:2015 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO 22301 or CSA STAR or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or FedRAMP High or Common Criteria or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or HIPAA or IRAP or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
Choose Omada if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
- Recommended as a dedicated IGA product for heavy audit, complex role, ERP, or on-premises needs
- Named among IGA leaders in KuppingerCole 2024 Leadership Compass
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | CyberArk | Omada |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 15.6% | 0.6% |
| Change vs last week | up+2.1% | up+0.6% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #7 | #34 |
| Share of voice | 6.1% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 19 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 49% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
CyberArk +0.5pp · Omada 0pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
CyberArk leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CyberArkOmada
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
0CyberArk ranked higher
2Omada ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | CyberArk | Omada |
|---|---|---|---|
| What should a identity and access management platform integrate with? | ChatGPT | #10 | #9 |
| Which Identity & Access Management vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #10 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | CyberArk | Omada |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Self-hosted and SaaS | SaaS on Microsoft Azure (EU or US region), private tenant, or on-premises |
| Compliance | SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO 9001:2015, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO 22301, CSA STAR, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, FedRAMP High, Common Criteria, PCI DSS v4.0.1, HIPAA, IRAP, GDPR, CCPA | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3 |
| Support | Support contact, Knowledge base, Technical community | Customer Success Team, Service Desk, ITSM system access, Professional services |
| Founded | 1999 | 2000 |
| Headquarters | Newton, MA, United States | Copenhagen, Denmark |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Post-IPO debt | Majority investment (GRO and Kirk Kapital) |
| Best for | Enterprises that need to secure privileged access for human and machine identities. | Regulated enterprises and government organizations that need identity governance and administration |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
CyberArk
- Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
- Strong identity security and credential risk mitigation
- Security-first approach with strong behavioral analytics
- Bridges standard access management with robust PAM and machine identity security
- Strong for enterprises combining workforce identity with PAM
Omada
- Recommended as a dedicated IGA product for heavy audit, complex role, ERP, or on-premises needs
- Named among IGA leaders in KuppingerCole 2024 Leadership Compass
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “CyberArk vs Omada”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cyberark-vs-omada, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.