Skip to content
SlateIndex
CyberArkUnified IAM, PAM, and IGA identity security platform.
vs
WorkOSYour app, Enterprise Ready.
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3

CyberArk vs WorkOS

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

CyberArk is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 15.6 versus 9.5 for WorkOS, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose CyberArk if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (15.6 vs 9.5)
  • You need SOC 2 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or ISO 9001:2015 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO 22301 or CSA STAR or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or FedRAMP High or Common Criteria or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or HIPAA or IRAP coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
  • Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)

Choose WorkOS if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 49% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or SIG Lite coverage
  • Highly transparent for B2B SaaS authentication
  • Best overall choice for typical B2B SaaS authentication

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric CyberArk WorkOS
Visibility score15.6%9.5%
Change vs last weekup+2.1%down−1.3%
Rank in Identity & Access Management#7#11
Share of voice6.1%3%
Mentions this run1910
Positive in AI answers49%56%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3CyberArk 16%

CyberArk +0.5pp · WorkOS +0.5999999999999996pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

CyberArk leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
17.5%
4.5%
AI Mode
16.5%
6.3%
Perplexity
14.6%
12.8%
CyberArkWorkOS

Head to head in AI answers

5 engine answers name both brands

5CyberArk ranked higher
0WorkOS ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionCyberArkWorkOS
Pricing model—Usage-based
Entry price—Contact sales
Free plan—Yes
DeploymentSelf-hosted and SaaSCloud APIs and SDKs
Integrations—20+
ComplianceSOC 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO 9001:2015, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO 22301, CSA STAR, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, FedRAMP High, Common Criteria, PCI DSS v4.0.1, HIPAA, IRAP, GDPR, CCPASOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, CCPA, SOC 3, SIG Lite
SupportSupport contact, Knowledge base, Technical communityEmail support, In-dashboard web support, Slack channel, Video calls
Founded19992019
HeadquartersNewton, MA, United StatesSan Francisco, California, United States
Employees1,001–5,00051–200
FundingPost-IPO debtSeed · $195M raised
Best forEnterprises that need to secure privileged access for human and machine identities.SaaS and AI companies that need to add enterprise features like SSO and SCIM to sell to large organizations.

Plans side by side

CyberArk

Pricing not available.

WorkOS

Pay as you go$0month, usage-based
Annual CreditsCustomcontact sales
WorkOS pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

CyberArk

  • Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
  • Strong identity security and credential risk mitigation
  • Security-first approach with strong behavioral analytics
  • Bridges standard access management with robust PAM and machine identity security
  • Strong for enterprises combining workforce identity with PAM

    WorkOS

    • Highly transparent for B2B SaaS authentication
    • Best overall choice for typical B2B SaaS authentication
    • Purpose-built for B2B SaaS to quickly unlock enterprise contracts
    • Generous free tier and usage-based pricing
    • Rapid enterprise feature integration (SSO, SCIM, provisioning)
    • Advanced enterprise SAML connections may incur extra costs

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “CyberArk vs WorkOS”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cyberark-vs-workos, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.