Skip to content
SlateIndex
DocuSignBringing Agreements to Life
vs
OneflowSmart contracts that feel like magic.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2

DocuSign vs Oneflow

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

DocuSign is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 21.9 versus 16.1 for Oneflow, and ranks ahead in 55% of the answers that name both.

Choose DocuSign if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (21.9 vs 16.1)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (34% vs 32% positive)
  • You need ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type II or PCI DSS or FedRAMP or CSA STAR or APEC PPP or SSAE 18 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)

Choose Oneflow if…

  • You need ISO 9001 or ISO 14001 or SOC 1 Type 1 or SOC 2 Type 1 coverage
  • Dynamic, collaborative digital contracts that stay editable after sending
  • Live contract editing and negotiation, reducing email back-and-forth
  • Free tier with basic contract management, comments, audit trails and dashboards

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric DocuSign Oneflow
Visibility score21.9%16.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Proposals & Contracts#6#7
Share of voice6.2%4.9%
Mentions this run3327
Positive in AI answers34%32%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2DocuSign 22%

DocuSign 0pp · Oneflow 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

DocuSign leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
35.7%
1.9%
AI Mode
13.7%
10.2%
Perplexity
16.3%
36.3%
DocuSignOneflow

Head to head in AI answers

11 engine answers name both brands

6DocuSign ranked higher
5Oneflow ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionDocuSignOneflow
Pricing modelPer seat—
Entry price$11 per seat / mo—
Free planNo—
Deployment—SaaS
Integrations1000+—
ComplianceISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type II, PCI DSS, FedRAMP, CSA STAR, APEC PPP, SSAE 18ISO 27001, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, SOC 1 Type 1, SOC 2 Type 1
Support24/7 live technical support on Enhanced plans, Docusign Support portalDedicated onboarding in the Enterprise tier
Founded20032012
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CA, United StatesStockholm, Sweden
Employees5,000+51–200
FundingInitial public offering · $500M raisedPrivate investment of SEK 20 million from Mattias Ståhlgren
Best forIndividuals and small to medium teams that need e-signature, and enterprises that need centralized agreement management with IAM.Teams of all shapes and sizes that need to handle their contracts

Plans side by side

DocuSign

Personal$11month, billed annually
Standard$30user/month, billed annually
Business Pro$45user/month, billed annually
Enhanced plansCustomcontact sales
DocuSign pricing

Oneflow

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

DocuSign

  • Strong integration with enterprise tools
  • Recommended as best enterprise agreement infrastructure via DocuSign CLM
  • Best-known choice for electronic signatures
  • Large customer base and wide worldwide use
  • Good fit for organisations already invested in DocuSign

    Oneflow

    • Dynamic, collaborative digital contracts that stay editable after sending
    • Live contract editing and negotiation, reducing email back-and-forth
    • Free tier with basic contract management, comments, audit trails and dashboards
    • Proposal-to-contract workflow turning interactive proposals into live contracts
    • Strong for contract management, with online signing and post-signature tracking
    • Interactive proposals and editable contracts require a paid plan
    • Smaller review coverage and pricing generally targets larger teams

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “DocuSign vs Oneflow”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/docusign-vs-oneflow, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.