Skip to content
SlateIndex
DoverYour startup's all-in-one hiring solution
vs
GreenhouseThe Orchestrated Hiring Ecosystem for the AI era
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Dover vs Greenhouse

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 3.6 for Dover, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Dover if…

  • You want a free plan to start
  • free hiring software
  • optional fractional recruiters for hands-on help
  • suitable for multiple open positions without cost

Choose Greenhouse if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 3.6)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or GDPR or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
  • Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Dover Greenhouse
Visibility score3.6%38.5%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#23#1
Share of voice0.7%8.1%
Mentions this run443
Positive in AI answers—56%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Dover 4%

Dover 0pp · Greenhouse 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
5%
43.5%
AI Mode
0%
33.5%
Perplexity
5.7%
38.3%
DoverGreenhouse

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

0Dover ranked higher
1Greenhouse ranked higher
PromptEngineDoverGreenhouse
Best recruiting platform for startups ChatGPT#6#2

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionDoverGreenhouse
Pricing modelFlat tiersFlat tiers
Entry priceFree; paid from $199 / moContact sales
Free planYesNo
Compliance—SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSS
SupportHelp center, Onboarding and premium support call with the Dover team on Premium—
Founded20192012
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CANew York City, NY, United States
Employees51–200501–1,000
FundingSeries A · $23M raisedSeries D · $110M raised
Best forFounding teams hiring their first hires on the free plan, and growing businesses that need the Premium ATSEmployers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises

Plans side by side

Dover

Free ATS$0
Premium ATS$199month
Dover pricing

Greenhouse

CoreCustom
PlusCustom
ProCustom
Greenhouse pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Dover

  • free hiring software
  • optional fractional recruiters for hands-on help
  • suitable for multiple open positions without cost

    Greenhouse

    • Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
    • Strong reporting and data visibility
    • Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
    • Integration ecosystem and unified data
    • Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Dover vs Greenhouse”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/dover-vs-greenhouse, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.