Eightfold vs Greenhouse
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 3.1 for Eightfold, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Eightfold if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or FedRAMP Moderate coverage
- Skills-based talent intelligence
Choose Greenhouse if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 3.1)
- AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 29% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or GDPR or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Eightfold | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.1% | 38.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #29 | #1 |
| Share of voice | 1.1% | 8.1% |
| Mentions this run | 7 | 43 |
| Positive in AI answers | 29% | 56% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Eightfold 0pp · Greenhouse 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
7 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Eightfold | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best recruiting tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #20 | #1 |
| Best recruiting platform for enterprise | ChatGPT | #7 | #4 |
| Compare the leading recruiting platforms | ChatGPT | #11 | #1 |
| Best recruiting platform with AI features | ChatGPT | #4 | #2 |
| Best recruiting platform with AI features | Perplexity | #3 | #2 |
| Which recruiting vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #8 | #6 |
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | ChatGPT | #12 | #2 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Eightfold | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, FedRAMP Moderate | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSS |
| Founded | 2016 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Santa Clara, California | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Series C · $397M raised | Series D · $110M raised |
| Best for | — | Employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises |
Plans side by side
Eightfold
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Eightfold
- Skills-based talent intelligence
Greenhouse
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
- Strong reporting and data visibility
- Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
- Integration ecosystem and unified data
- Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Eightfold vs Greenhouse”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/eightfold-vs-greenhouse, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.