FullStory vs June
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
FullStory is the stronger AI pick in Product Analytics: it has a visibility score of 9.1 versus 2.4 for June, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose FullStory if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (9.1 vs 2.4)
- You need SOC 3 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- session replay and UX friction analysis
Choose June if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 19% positive)
- Account-level simplicity for B2B SaaS companies past $1M ARR
- Suited to PLG startups lacking a data team
- Included in shortlists of leading product analytics vendors
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | FullStory | June |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 9.1% | 2.4% |
| Change vs last week | up+0.1% | up+0.4% |
| Rank in Product Analytics | #9 | #15 |
| Share of voice | 3.8% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 19 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 19% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
FullStory +0.1999999999999993pp · June +0.3999999999999999pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
FullStory leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | FullStory | June |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top product analytics tool options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #8 | #1 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | FullStory | June |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | — | Cloud |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, ISO 42001 | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Onboarding with Fullstory specialists, Professional services: Insights+ consulting and Data+ configuration, Advantage Subscription expert guidance | — |
| Founded | 2014 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Atlanta, GA, United States | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 1–10 |
| Funding | Series C (one source: $32M led by Stripes) | Seed · $2M raised |
| Best for | Product, UX, and growth teams | — |
Plans side by side
June
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
FullStory
- session replay and UX friction analysis
- combines quantitative and qualitative data
- digital experience intelligence and qualitative debugging
- frequently recommended by analysts and industry lists
- useful heatmaps and session recordings
June
- Account-level simplicity for B2B SaaS companies past $1M ARR
- Suited to PLG startups lacking a data team
- Included in shortlists of leading product analytics vendors
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “FullStory vs June”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/fullstory-vs-june, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.