Skip to content
SlateIndex
FullStoryIntelligent digital experiences. Powered by human context.
vs
PostHogYour product's context layer.
Comparison · Product Analytics · weekly run Nov 3

FullStory vs PostHog

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

PostHog is the stronger AI pick in Product Analytics: it has a visibility score of 56.6 versus 9.1 for FullStory, and ranks ahead in 78% of the answers that name both.

Choose FullStory if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
  • session replay and UX friction analysis

Choose PostHog if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (56.6 vs 9.1)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (57% vs 19% positive)
  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR or HIPAA coverage

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric FullStory PostHog
Visibility score9.1%56.6%
Change vs last weekup+0.1%up+1.2%
Rank in Product Analytics#9#3
Share of voice3.8%14.1%
Mentions this run1966
Positive in AI answers19%57%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3FullStory 9%

FullStory +0.1999999999999993pp · PostHog +1.2000000000000028pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

PostHog leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
7.8%
68%
AI Mode
5.4%
45.7%
Perplexity
14.1%
56.1%
FullStoryPostHog

Head to head in AI answers

18 engine answers name both brands

4FullStory ranked higher
14PostHog ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionFullStoryPostHog
Pricing modelFlat tiersUsage-based
Entry priceContact salesContact sales
Free planYesYes
Deployment—PostHog Cloud in US or EU regions, or self-hosted
Integrations—926+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, ISO 42001SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, HIPAA
SupportOnboarding with Fullstory specialists, Professional services: Insights+ consulting and Data+ configuration, Advantage Subscription expert guidanceCommunity support on the free plan, Email support on pay-as-you-go, Slack support for plans over $2k/mo, Paid onboarding call
Founded20142020
HeadquartersAtlanta, GA, United StatesSan Francisco, CA, United States
Employees501–1,000201–500
FundingSeries C (one source: $32M led by Stripes)Series E
Best forProduct, UX, and growth teamsProduct engineers, product managers, growth engineers and founders who want analytics, session replay, flags and experiments in one platform.

Plans side by side

FullStory

FullstoryFree$0month
BusinessCustom
AdvancedCustom
EnterpriseCustom
FullStory pricing

PostHog

Free$0month
Pay-as-you-go$0month base, usage-based above free tier
PostHog pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

FullStory

  • session replay and UX friction analysis
  • combines quantitative and qualitative data
  • digital experience intelligence and qualitative debugging
  • frequently recommended by analysts and industry lists
  • useful heatmaps and session recordings

    PostHog

    • Open-source, developer-first platform
    • All-in-one bundle of analytics, session replay, feature flags and A/B testing
    • Transparent, public pay-as-you-go pricing
    • Generous free tier for small teams
    • Strong adoption and best value for startups
    • Pricing often requires sales-assisted quotes

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “FullStory vs PostHog”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/fullstory-vs-posthog, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.