FullStory vs UXCam
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
FullStory is the stronger AI pick in Product Analytics: it has a visibility score of 9.1 versus 1.9 for UXCam, and ranks ahead in 25% of the answers that name both.
Choose FullStory if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (9.1 vs 1.9)
- AI answers describe it more positively (19% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 3 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
Choose UXCam if…
- You need SOC 1 or GDPR or HIPAA (signs a BAA) coverage
- Strong for mobile-first products needing screen-level and touch-level analysis
- Offers a 14-day free trial
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | FullStory | UXCam |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 9.1% | 1.9% |
| Change vs last week | up+0.1% | down−1.2% |
| Rank in Product Analytics | #9 | #20 |
| Share of voice | 3.8% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 19 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 19% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
FullStory +0.1999999999999993pp · UXCam −1.2000000000000002pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
FullStory leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
4 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | FullStory | UXCam |
|---|---|---|---|
| What features matter most in a product analytics tool? | Perplexity | #7 | #6 |
| What are the best Product Analytics tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #13 | #9 |
| Compare the leading Product Analytics platforms | Perplexity | #6 | #8 |
| Official website of the top product analytics tool vendors | Perplexity | #12 | #8 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | FullStory | UXCam |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-hosted, with data hosting in the EU, USA or UAE |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, ISO 42001 | SOC 1, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA (signs a BAA) |
| Support | Onboarding with Fullstory specialists, Professional services: Insights+ consulting and Data+ configuration, Advantage Subscription expert guidance | Guided onboarding and integration support, Demo with an expert |
| Founded | 2014 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Atlanta, GA, United States | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series C (one source: $32M led by Stripes) | Seed (led by Headline) · $5M raised |
| Best for | Product, UX, and growth teams | Product managers, growth marketers, engineers and customer support teams working on mobile apps and websites |
Plans side by side
UXCam
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
FullStory
- session replay and UX friction analysis
- combines quantitative and qualitative data
- digital experience intelligence and qualitative debugging
- frequently recommended by analysts and industry lists
- useful heatmaps and session recordings
UXCam
- Strong for mobile-first products needing screen-level and touch-level analysis
- Offers a 14-day free trial
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “FullStory vs UXCam”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/fullstory-vs-uxcam, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.