FyleEffortless expense management for your existing credit cards. Now part of Sage.
vs
PayhawkAI-native spend management platform for global teams
Comparison · Expense Management · weekly run Nov 2
Fyle vs Payhawk
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Fyle is the stronger AI pick in Expense Management: it has a visibility score of 14.8 versus 1.7 for Payhawk, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Fyle if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (14.8 vs 1.7)
- You want a lower entry price ($11.99 vs $299)
- You need SOC 2 Type 1 or GDPR or PCI DSS coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Payhawk if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (60% vs 11% positive)
- You need PCI DSS Level 1 or ISO 27001 or SOC 1 Type 2 or GDPR compliant or DORA compliant or CSA STAR Level 1 or IDW PS 880 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Fyle | Payhawk |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 14.8% | 1.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Expense Management | #9 | #20 |
| Share of voice | 4.2% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 21 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 11% | 60% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Fyle 0pp · Payhawk 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Fyle leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
FylePayhawk
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0Fyle ranked higher
1Payhawk ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Fyle | Payhawk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top expense management tool vendors | ChatGPT | #13 | #11 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Fyle | Payhawk |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $11.99 / mo | $299 / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Onboarding fee | — | Included |
| Deployment | Web app and mobile app | Web portal and mobile app |
| Integrations | — | 40+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 1, SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, PCI DSS | PCI DSS Level 1, ISO 27001, SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR compliant, DORA compliant, CSA STAR Level 1, IDW PS 880 |
| Support | Basic email and knowledge base support, Optional premium support with live chat during business hours, 24/7 support via live chat and email for Business plan users, Named account manager on Business and Enterprise plans | Help center, Sales team, Dedicated implementations team at no additional cost |
| Founded | 2017 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Newark, Delaware, United States | London, United Kingdom |
| Employees | 51–200 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Round listed by Tracxn as Series A, amount not disclosed · $11M raised | Series B extension |
| Best for | Small businesses and mid-market companies that pay expenses on corporate credit cards. | Scaleups and enterprise companies that manage spend across several entities and countries. |
Plans side by side
Fyle
Growth$11.99active user/month, billed annually (min 5 users)
Business$14.99active user/month, billed annually (min 10 users)
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing, 250+ employees
Payhawk
Travel$299month (starting at)
Cards & Expenses$449month (starting at)
Accounts Payable$349month (starting at)
Procurement$499month (starting at)
Payhawk CompleteCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Fyle
- seamless sync with accounting and ERP systems
- real-time expense tracking with corporate cards
- auto-categorizes expenses based on learned behavior
- strong user ratings, around 4.8/5 on G2
Payhawk
- recommended for international per diem and policy complexity
- recommended for global finance teams
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Fyle vs Payhawk”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/fyle-vs-payhawk, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.