Skip to content
SlateIndex
FyleEffortless expense management for your existing credit cards. Now part of Sage.
vs
PayhawkAI-native spend management platform for global teams
Comparison · Expense Management · weekly run Nov 2

Fyle vs Payhawk

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Fyle is the stronger AI pick in Expense Management: it has a visibility score of 14.8 versus 1.7 for Payhawk, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.

Choose Fyle if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (14.8 vs 1.7)
  • You want a lower entry price ($11.99 vs $299)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 1 or GDPR or PCI DSS coverage
  • Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers

Choose Payhawk if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (60% vs 11% positive)
  • You need PCI DSS Level 1 or ISO 27001 or SOC 1 Type 2 or GDPR compliant or DORA compliant or CSA STAR Level 1 or IDW PS 880 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Fyle Payhawk
Visibility score14.8%1.7%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Expense Management#9#20
Share of voice4.2%0.9%
Mentions this run215
Positive in AI answers11%60%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Fyle 15%

Fyle 0pp · Payhawk 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Fyle leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
16.1%
2.2%
AI Mode
15.7%
0%
Perplexity
12.6%
2.8%
FylePayhawk

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

0Fyle ranked higher
1Payhawk ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionFylePayhawk
Pricing modelUsage-basedFlat tiers
Entry price$11.99 / mo$299 / mo
Free planNoNo
Onboarding fee—Included
DeploymentWeb app and mobile appWeb portal and mobile app
Integrations—40+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 1, SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, PCI DSSPCI DSS Level 1, ISO 27001, SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR compliant, DORA compliant, CSA STAR Level 1, IDW PS 880
SupportBasic email and knowledge base support, Optional premium support with live chat during business hours, 24/7 support via live chat and email for Business plan users, Named account manager on Business and Enterprise plansHelp center, Sales team, Dedicated implementations team at no additional cost
Founded20172018
HeadquartersNewark, Delaware, United StatesLondon, United Kingdom
Employees51–200501–1,000
FundingRound listed by Tracxn as Series A, amount not disclosed · $11M raisedSeries B extension
Best forSmall businesses and mid-market companies that pay expenses on corporate credit cards.Scaleups and enterprise companies that manage spend across several entities and countries.

Plans side by side

Fyle

Growth$11.99active user/month, billed annually (min 5 users)
Business$14.99active user/month, billed annually (min 10 users)
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing, 250+ employees
Fyle pricing

Payhawk

Travel$299month (starting at)
Cards & Expenses$449month (starting at)
Accounts Payable$349month (starting at)
Procurement$499month (starting at)
Payhawk CompleteCustomcontact sales
Payhawk pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Fyle

  • seamless sync with accounting and ERP systems
  • real-time expense tracking with corporate cards
  • auto-categorizes expenses based on learned behavior
  • strong user ratings, around 4.8/5 on G2

    Payhawk

    • recommended for international per diem and policy complexity
    • recommended for global finance teams

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Fyle vs Payhawk”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/fyle-vs-payhawk, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.