Gem vs Humanly

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Gem is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 5.1 versus 0.6 for Humanly, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Gem if…

You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.1 vs 0.6)
You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
Strong option for recruiting teams in 2026

Choose Humanly if…

conversational 24/7 AI screening
automated scheduling
front-end candidate engagement

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric	Gem	Humanly
Visibility score	5.1%	0.6%
Change vs last week	New	New
Rank in Recruiting	#19	#58
Share of voice	1.7%	0.4%
Mentions this run	10	2
Positive in AI answers	33%	—

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

Gem 0pp · Humanly 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Gem leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT

8.9%

0.9%

AI Mode

0.9%

Perplexity

5.6%

GemHumanly

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

1Gem ranked higher

0Humanly ranked higher

Prompt	Engine	Gem	Humanly
Compare the leading recruiting platforms	ChatGPT	#13	#17

Features, pricing & fit

Dimension	Gem	Humanly
Pricing model	Per seat	—
Entry price	$130 per seat / mo	—
Free plan	No	—
Deployment	Web application and Chrome extension	—
Compliance	SOC 2 Type II	—
Support	Onshore support, success and development team	Vendor team can help design and optimize AI Interviewers on request
Founded	2017	2020
Headquarters	—	Seattle, Washington
Employees	51–200	11–50
Funding	Series C · $148M raised	Series B · $52M raised
Best for	Growing talent acquisition teams, from startups to global enterprises, that want sourcing, ATS and CRM in one platform or AI layered onto an existing ATS.	High-volume hiring teams recruiting hourly, frontline and field workers