Skip to content
SlateIndex
GemBetter recruiting, built on Gem.
vs
SeekOutThe agentic AI recruiting platform that runs on your terms
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Gem vs SeekOut

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

SeekOut is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 5.3 versus 5.1 for Gem, and ranks ahead in 17% of the answers that name both.

Choose Gem if…

  • You want a lower entry price ($130 vs $149)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 25% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
  • Strong option for recruiting teams in 2026

Choose SeekOut if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.3 vs 5.1)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR or CCPA or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 23894:2023 coverage
  • Free trial with unlimited AI-powered profile searches
  • Strong for sourcing passive talent

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Gem SeekOut
Visibility score5.1%5.3%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#19#18
Share of voice1.7%1.9%
Mentions this run1011
Positive in AI answers33%25%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Gem 5%

Gem 0pp · SeekOut 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

SeekOut leads on 1 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
8.9%
7.8%
AI Mode
0.9%
3.7%
Perplexity
5.6%
4.4%
GemSeekOut

Head to head in AI answers

6 engine answers name both brands

5Gem ranked higher
1SeekOut ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionGemSeekOut
Pricing modelPer seatPer seat
Entry price$130 per seat / mo$149 per seat / mo
Free planNoNo · 14-day trial
DeploymentWeb application and Chrome extensionCloud, hosted on Microsoft Azure
ComplianceSOC 2 Type IISOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, CCPA, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 23894:2023
SupportOnshore support, success and development teamHelp center and trainings, Dedicated customer success on higher plans, Dedicated integration and onboarding, White-glove implementation on the full plan
Founded20172017
Headquarters—Bellevue, WA, United States
Employees51–20051–200
FundingSeries C · $148M raisedSeries C · $189M raised
Best forGrowing talent acquisition teams, from startups to global enterprises, that want sourcing, ATS and CRM in one platform or AI layered onto an existing ATS.Solo sourcers and teams starting with dedicated recruiting seats, up to enterprises running the full recruiting funnel

Plans side by side

Gem

Gem + Your ATSCustomCustom pricing based on company FTE count
Gem All-in-OneCustomCustom pricing based on company FTE count
Gem Startup Program$130per month, billed yearly
Gem pricing

SeekOut

SeekOut Sourcing Core (Recruit Core)$149per seat per month, billed annually; $179/mo billed monthly
SeekOut Sourcing (Recruit)Customper seat, custom, billed annually
SeekOut Sourcing + Integration (Recruit)Customcustom packages by team size, billed annually
SeekOut Full Recruiting Funnel (Recruit)Customcustom, billed annually
SeekOut pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Gem

  • Strong option for recruiting teams in 2026
  • Startup discount on yearly billing
  • Candidate sourcing and interview management
  • Career websites and candidate engagement

    SeekOut

    • Free trial with unlimited AI-powered profile searches
    • Strong for sourcing passive talent
    • Per-recruiter cost may be high relative to alternatives

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Gem vs SeekOut”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/gem-vs-seekout, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.