Gem vs SmartRecruiters
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
SmartRecruiters is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 13.6 versus 5.1 for Gem, and ranks ahead in 60% of the answers that name both.
Choose Gem if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 31% positive)
- Strong option for recruiting teams in 2026
- Startup discount on yearly billing
- Candidate sourcing and interview management
Choose SmartRecruiters if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (13.6 vs 5.1)
- You need TISAX or CCPA or ISO 27001 or UK Cyber Essentials coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Balances consumer-grade candidate experience with enterprise ATS features
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Gem | SmartRecruiters |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.1% | 13.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #19 | #13 |
| Share of voice | 1.7% | 3.7% |
| Mentions this run | 10 | 21 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 31% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Gem 0pp · SmartRecruiters 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
SmartRecruiters leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
5 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Gem | SmartRecruiters |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best recruiting tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #6 | #11 |
| What are the best recruiting tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #10 | #5 |
| Top recruiting platform options for B2B SaaS companies | ChatGPT | #4 | #6 |
| Compare the leading recruiting platforms | ChatGPT | #13 | #6 |
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | ChatGPT | #20 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Gem | SmartRecruiters |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $130 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Web application and Chrome extension | SaaS |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | TISAX, CCPA, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, UK Cyber Essentials |
| Support | Onshore support, success and development team | Community & Help Center, Developer Documentation |
| Founded | 2017 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | — | San Francisco, California |
| Employees | 51–200 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Series C · $148M raised | Series E · $205M raised |
| Best for | Growing talent acquisition teams, from startups to global enterprises, that want sourcing, ATS and CRM in one platform or AI layered onto an existing ATS. | Corporate employers with at least 50 employees and a significant number of open job requisitions |
Plans side by side
Gem
SmartRecruiters
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Gem
- Strong option for recruiting teams in 2026
- Startup discount on yearly billing
- Candidate sourcing and interview management
- Career websites and candidate engagement
SmartRecruiters
- Balances consumer-grade candidate experience with enterprise ATS features
- Suited to high-growth global enterprises
- Modern, collaborative interface
- Broad, consolidated talent-acquisition suite
- Enterprise hiring and collaborative applicant tracking platform
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Gem vs SmartRecruiters”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/gem-vs-smartrecruiters, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.