Skip to content
SlateIndex
GetAcceptRun every deal like your best sales rep
vs
ResponsiveResponsive AI powers bids, questionnaires, and trust centers with insight, accuracy, and speed.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2

GetAccept vs Responsive

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

GetAccept is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 15.7 versus 10.7 for Responsive, and ranks ahead in 83% of the answers that name both.

Choose GetAccept if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (15.7 vs 10.7)
  • You want a lower entry price ($25 vs $10,000)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (43% vs 33% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 or eIDAS (AdES, QES) coverage

Choose Responsive if…

  • You need AICPA SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or STAR Level 1 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
  • Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric GetAccept Responsive
Visibility score15.7%10.7%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Proposals & Contracts#8#10
Share of voice4.8%4%
Mentions this run2620
Positive in AI answers43%33%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2GetAccept 16%

GetAccept 0pp · Responsive 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

GetAccept leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
11.1%
3%
AI Mode
9.4%
15.7%
Perplexity
26.5%
13.3%
GetAcceptResponsive

Head to head in AI answers

12 engine answers name both brands

10GetAccept ranked higher
2Responsive ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionGetAcceptResponsive
Pricing modelPer seatFlat tiers
Entry price$25 per seat / mo$10,000 / mo
Free planNoNo
DeploymentCloud-hosted SaaSFlexible hosting options
Integrations—32+
ComplianceSOC 2, GDPR, CCPA, eIDAS (AdES, QES)GDPR, AICPA SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CCPA, STAR Level 1
SupportHelp center and chat support (06:00–00:00 UTC), Dedicated customer success manager (add-on)Professional Services with APMP-certified experts for onboarding and training, Premium deployment and support on Growth and Enterprise editions
Founded20152015
HeadquartersPalo Alto, California, United StatesFrisco, Texas, United States
Employees51–200501–1,000
FundingSeries B, led by Bessemer Venture PartnersRound led by Elevate Capital
Best forB2B sales teams: smaller teams that need e-signature, and larger teams scaling complex sales processes on the AI-native planDedicated proposal or operations teams with legal, InfoSec and compliance involvement, and global or multi-region operations.

Plans side by side

GetAccept

eSign$25per user/month
Professional$49per user/month, minimum 5 users
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
GetAccept pricing

Responsive

Emerging Edition$10,000year (starting from, platform fee)
Growth EditionCustomyear
Enterprise EditionCustomyear
Responsive pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

GetAccept

  • All-in-one proposal and e-signature tool with document tracking
  • Strong interactive deal rooms and sales-room features
  • Good fit for heavier sales-enablement needs
  • Suited to multi-stakeholder B2B SaaS deals
  • Strong buyer engagement and analytics for CRM-centred sales

    Responsive

    • Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
    • Designed for complex enterprise responses
    • Top pick for RFP response management
    • Good for security questionnaires and large-scale content reuse
    • Recommended in G2's 2026 RFP software list

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “GetAccept vs Responsive”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/getaccept-vs-responsive, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.