Skip to content
SlateIndex
ProposifyProposal software that gives you control and insight into the close.
vs
ResponsiveResponsive AI powers bids, questionnaires, and trust centers with insight, accuracy, and speed.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2

Proposify vs Responsive

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Proposify is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 41.4 versus 10.7 for Responsive, and ranks ahead in 71% of the answers that name both.

Choose Proposify if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (41.4 vs 10.7)
  • You want a lower entry price ($49 vs $10,000)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (49% vs 33% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage

Choose Responsive if…

  • You need AICPA SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or CCPA or STAR Level 1 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
  • Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Proposify Responsive
Visibility score41.4%10.7%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Proposals & Contracts#2#10
Share of voice9.4%4%
Mentions this run4920
Positive in AI answers49%33%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Proposify 41%

Proposify 0pp · Responsive 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Proposify leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
50.9%
3%
AI Mode
39.3%
15.7%
Perplexity
33.9%
13.3%
ProposifyResponsive

Head to head in AI answers

17 engine answers name both brands

12Proposify ranked higher
5Responsive ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionProposifyResponsive
Pricing modelPer seatFlat tiers
Entry price$49 per seat / mo$10,000 / mo
Free planNo · 14-day trialNo
DeploymentCloud-hosted SaaSFlexible hosting options
Integrations—32+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, GDPRGDPR, AICPA SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CCPA, STAR Level 1
SupportEmail and chat support, Phone and Zoom support, Dedicated success manager on Scale plan, Priority supportProfessional Services with APMP-certified experts for onboarding and training, Premium deployment and support on Growth and Enterprise editions
Founded20132015
HeadquartersHalifax, Nova Scotia, CanadaFrisco, Texas, United States
Employees51–200501–1,000
FundingGrowth Equity - II (CB Insights)Round led by Elevate Capital
Best forBusy sales teams that send proposals and quotes, such as consultants and service firms in landscaping, janitorial and construction.Dedicated proposal or operations teams with legal, InfoSec and compliance involvement, and global or multi-region operations.

Plans side by side

Proposify

Build$49user/month (monthly); $39/user/mo billed annually ($468/user/year)
Grow$65user/month, billed annually ($780/user/year)
Scale$12,800year platform fee, includes 10 users; extra users $780/user/year
Proposify pricing

Responsive

Emerging Edition$10,000year (starting from, platform fee)
Growth EditionCustomyear
Enterprise EditionCustomyear
Responsive pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Proposify

  • Visually rich, branded proposal design
  • Robust tracking and granular proposal analytics
  • Well-regarded with strong user satisfaction
  • Quotes and contracts with built-in approval workflows
  • Discounted annual pricing lowers effective per-user cost

    Responsive

    • Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
    • Designed for complex enterprise responses
    • Top pick for RFP response management
    • Good for security questionnaires and large-scale content reuse
    • Recommended in G2's 2026 RFP software list

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Proposify vs Responsive”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/proposify-vs-responsive, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.