QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
vs
ResponsiveResponsive AI powers bids, questionnaires, and trust centers with insight, accuracy, and speed.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
Qwilr vs Responsive
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 28.3 versus 10.7 for Responsive, and ranks ahead in 87% of the answers that name both.
Choose Qwilr if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (28.3 vs 10.7)
- You want a lower entry price ($35 vs $10,000)
- AI answers describe it more positively (51% vs 33% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or PCI-DSS coverage
Choose Responsive if…
- You need GDPR or AICPA SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or CCPA or STAR Level 1 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Qwilr | Responsive |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 28.3% | 10.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #4 | #10 |
| Share of voice | 7.2% | 4% |
| Mentions this run | 37 | 20 |
| Positive in AI answers | 51% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Qwilr 0pp · Responsive 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qwilr leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
QwilrResponsive
Head to head in AI answers
15 engine answers name both brands
13Qwilr ranked higher
2Responsive ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Qwilr | Responsive |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Proposals & Contracts tools in 2026? | AI Mode | #2 | #3 |
| What are the best Proposals & Contracts tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #3 | #9 |
| Top proposal and contract tool options for B2B SaaS companies | AI Mode | #5 | #6 |
| Top proposal and contract tool options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #3 | #12 |
| Best proposal and contract tool for startups | AI Mode | #3 | #4 |
| Compare the leading Proposals & Contracts platforms | AI Mode | #4 | #5 |
| Compare the leading Proposals & Contracts platforms | Perplexity | #3 | #9 |
| Alternatives to the most popular proposal and contract tool | AI Mode | #4 | #8 |
| Alternatives to the most popular proposal and contract tool | Perplexity | #3 | #12 |
| Best proposal and contract tool with AI features | AI Mode | #5 | #6 |
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #6 | #3 |
| Official website of the top proposal and contract tool vendors | ChatGPT | #3 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Qwilr | Responsive |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $35 per seat / mo | $10,000 / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No |
| Deployment | Web-based, web-native software | Flexible hosting options |
| Integrations | — | 32+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS | GDPR, AICPA SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CCPA, STAR Level 1 |
| Support | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions | Professional Services with APMP-certified experts for onboarding and training, Premium deployment and support on Growth and Enterprise editions |
| Founded | 2014 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia | Frisco, Texas, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised | Round led by Elevate Capital |
| Best for | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. | Dedicated proposal or operations teams with legal, InfoSec and compliance involvement, and global or multi-region operations. |
Plans side by side
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Responsive
Emerging Edition$10,000year (starting from, platform fee)
Growth EditionCustomyear
Enterprise EditionCustomyear
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Responsive
- Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
- Designed for complex enterprise responses
- Top pick for RFP response management
- Good for security questionnaires and large-scale content reuse
- Recommended in G2's 2026 RFP software list
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Qwilr vs Responsive”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/qwilr-vs-responsive, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.