Skip to content
SlateIndex
PandaDocProposals & Contracts
vs
ResponsiveResponsive AI powers bids, questionnaires, and trust centers with insight, accuracy, and speed.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2

PandaDoc vs Responsive

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

PandaDoc is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 79.8 versus 10.7 for Responsive, and ranks ahead in 86% of the answers that name both.

Choose PandaDoc if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (79.8 vs 10.7)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (62% vs 33% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or HIPAA (signs Business Associate Agreement) or eIDAS or ESIGN and UETA or FERPA or 21 CFR Part 11 for eSignatures coverage
  • All-in-one document workflows covering proposals, quotes, contracts, and e-signatures

Choose Responsive if…

  • You need AICPA SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or CCPA or STAR Level 1 coverage
  • Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
  • Designed for complex enterprise responses
  • Top pick for RFP response management

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric PandaDoc Responsive
Visibility score79.8%10.7%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Proposals & Contracts#1#10
Share of voice13.8%4%
Mentions this run7220
Positive in AI answers62%33%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2PandaDoc 80%

PandaDoc 0pp · Responsive 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

PandaDoc leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
83.2%
3%
AI Mode
72.4%
15.7%
Perplexity
83.9%
13.3%
PandaDocResponsive

Head to head in AI answers

21 engine answers name both brands

18PandaDoc ranked higher
3Responsive ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionPandaDocResponsive
Pricing model—Flat tiers
Entry price—$10,000 / mo
Free plan—No
DeploymentCloud-based service with US or EU data residency options and AES-256 encryption at restFlexible hosting options
Integrations—32+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, HIPAA (signs Business Associate Agreement), GDPR, eIDAS, ESIGN and UETA, FERPA, 21 CFR Part 11 for eSignaturesGDPR, AICPA SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CCPA, STAR Level 1
Support—Professional Services with APMP-certified experts for onboarding and training, Premium deployment and support on Growth and Enterprise editions
Founded20132015
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CaliforniaFrisco, Texas, United States
Employees501–1,000501–1,000
FundingRound led by Índico Capital Partners (stage reported differently by sources)Round led by Elevate Capital
Best forSales, revenue and operations teams producing proposals, quotes and contractsDedicated proposal or operations teams with legal, InfoSec and compliance involvement, and global or multi-region operations.

Plans side by side

PandaDoc

Pricing not available.

Responsive

Emerging Edition$10,000year (starting from, platform fee)
Growth EditionCustomyear
Enterprise EditionCustomyear
Responsive pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

PandaDoc

  • All-in-one document workflows covering proposals, quotes, contracts, and e-signatures
  • Widely considered a market leader and top-rated for proposals and contracts
  • Intuitive drag-and-drop proposal creation with template libraries
  • Free plan for basic e-signatures and proposals
  • Annual billing lowers the cost of paid tiers
  • Costs rise as teams scale up
  • Free plan has usage limits

Responsive

  • Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
  • Designed for complex enterprise responses
  • Top pick for RFP response management
  • Good for security questionnaires and large-scale content reuse
  • Recommended in G2's 2026 RFP software list

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “PandaDoc vs Responsive”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/pandadoc-vs-responsive, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.