GlassboxAI-powered customer intelligence insights for proactive, preventive and secure digital customer experiences.
vs
HotjarHotjar is now Contentsquare: heatmaps, recordings and surveys.
Comparison · Web Analytics · weekly run Nov 2
Glassbox vs Hotjar
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Hotjar is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 4.9 versus 4.4 for Glassbox, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Glassbox if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (83% vs 6% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 42001 or CSA STAR Level 1 coverage
- Strong enterprise performer blending quantitative analytics with qualitative context
- Analysts frequently recommend it for combining event data with session replays
Choose Hotjar if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.9 vs 4.4)
- You need ISO 27018 or SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
- Session replay and heatmaps for behavior analysis
- Combines visual behavior with quantitative and feedback data
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Glassbox | Hotjar |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.4% | 4.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Web Analytics | #17 | #15 |
| Share of voice | 1.2% | 1.9% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 10 |
| Positive in AI answers | 83% | 6% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Glassbox 0pp · Hotjar 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Hotjar leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GlassboxHotjar
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1Glassbox ranked higher
0Hotjar ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Glassbox | Hotjar |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which Web Analytics vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #11 | #13 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Glassbox | Hotjar |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $39 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Single-tenant cloud on AWS or Microsoft Azure, and multi-tenant cloud. | — |
| Integrations | — | 10+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CSA STAR Level 1 | ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, SOC 2 Type 2 |
| Support | — | AI-powered support on the free plan, Priority support on Pro and Enterprise, Community, Education |
| Founded | 2010 | — |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | — |
| Employees | 201–500 | — |
| Funding | Minority investment from Poalim Equity · $70M raised | — |
| Best for | Highly regulated enterprises, such as financial services organisations, that need digital experience analytics with security and compliance. | Midsize and SMB businesses that want heatmaps, session recordings and surveys in one product experience platform. |
Plans side by side
Glassbox
Pricing not available.
Hotjar
Free$0forever
Growth$39month, billed yearly ($49 billed monthly); from 7k monthly sessions
ProCustomcustom
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Glassbox
- Strong enterprise performer blending quantitative analytics with qualitative context
- Analysts frequently recommend it for combining event data with session replays
- Exceptionally high user ratings, around 4.8 to 4.9 out of 5 on G2
- Deep customer journey mapping and session playback
- Highest review rating among established web analytics tools
Hotjar
- Session replay and heatmaps for behavior analysis
- Combines visual behavior with quantitative and feedback data
- Basic free tier or trial available
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Glassbox vs Hotjar”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/glassbox-vs-hotjar, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.