Skip to content
SlateIndex
GlassboxAI-powered customer intelligence insights for proactive, preventive and secure digital customer experiences.
vs
HotjarHotjar is now Contentsquare: heatmaps, recordings and surveys.
Comparison · Web Analytics · weekly run Nov 2

Glassbox vs Hotjar

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Hotjar is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 4.9 versus 4.4 for Glassbox, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.

Choose Glassbox if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (83% vs 6% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 42001 or CSA STAR Level 1 coverage
  • Strong enterprise performer blending quantitative analytics with qualitative context
  • Analysts frequently recommend it for combining event data with session replays

Choose Hotjar if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.9 vs 4.4)
  • You need ISO 27018 or SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
  • Session replay and heatmaps for behavior analysis
  • Combines visual behavior with quantitative and feedback data

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Glassbox Hotjar
Visibility score4.4%4.9%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Web Analytics#17#15
Share of voice1.2%1.9%
Mentions this run610
Positive in AI answers83%6%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Glassbox 4%

Glassbox 0pp · Hotjar 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Hotjar leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
4.8%
4.6%
AI Mode
3.7%
5%
Perplexity
4.6%
5.2%
GlassboxHotjar

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

1Glassbox ranked higher
0Hotjar ranked higher
PromptEngineGlassboxHotjar
Which Web Analytics vendors do analysts recommend? Perplexity#11#13

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionGlassboxHotjar
Pricing model—Usage-based
Entry price—Free; paid from $39 / mo
Free plan—Yes
DeploymentSingle-tenant cloud on AWS or Microsoft Azure, and multi-tenant cloud.—
Integrations—10+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CSA STAR Level 1ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, SOC 2 Type 2
Support—AI-powered support on the free plan, Priority support on Pro and Enterprise, Community, Education
Founded2010—
HeadquartersLondon, United Kingdom—
Employees201–500—
FundingMinority investment from Poalim Equity · $70M raised—
Best forHighly regulated enterprises, such as financial services organisations, that need digital experience analytics with security and compliance.Midsize and SMB businesses that want heatmaps, session recordings and surveys in one product experience platform.

Plans side by side

Glassbox

Pricing not available.

Hotjar

Free$0forever
Growth$39month, billed yearly ($49 billed monthly); from 7k monthly sessions
ProCustomcustom
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Hotjar pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Glassbox

  • Strong enterprise performer blending quantitative analytics with qualitative context
  • Analysts frequently recommend it for combining event data with session replays
  • Exceptionally high user ratings, around 4.8 to 4.9 out of 5 on G2
  • Deep customer journey mapping and session playback
  • Highest review rating among established web analytics tools

    Hotjar

    • Session replay and heatmaps for behavior analysis
    • Combines visual behavior with quantitative and feedback data
    • Basic free tier or trial available

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Glassbox vs Hotjar”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/glassbox-vs-hotjar, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.