Skip to content
SlateIndex
GreenhouseThe Orchestrated Hiring Ecosystem for the AI era
vs
hireEZEnterprise Hiring, Run by Agents. Recruiters Decide.
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Greenhouse vs hireEZ

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 2.5 for hireEZ, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Greenhouse if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 2.5)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 29% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or GDPR or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)

Choose hireEZ if…

  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
  • AI-powered outbound sourcing
  • cross-platform talent mapping
  • diversity hiring support

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Greenhouse hireEZ
Visibility score38.5%2.5%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#1#33
Share of voice8.1%1.1%
Mentions this run436
Positive in AI answers56%29%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Greenhouse 39%

Greenhouse 0pp · hireEZ 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
43.5%
4.4%
AI Mode
33.5%
0.9%
Perplexity
38.3%
2.2%
GreenhousehireEZ

Head to head in AI answers

5 engine answers name both brands

5Greenhouse ranked higher
0hireEZ ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionGreenhousehireEZ
Pricing modelFlat tiersPer seat
Entry priceContact sales$494 per seat / mo
Free planNoNo · 7-day trial
Deployment—Layered on top of the customer's existing ATS with no rip-and-replace, deployed in weeks.
Integrations—40+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSS—
Founded20122015
HeadquartersNew York City, NY, United StatesMountain View, California, US
Employees501–1,00051–200
FundingSeries D · $110M raisedSeries C
Best forEmployers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprisesEnterprise talent acquisition teams that want agentic AI added to their existing ATS, as well as individual recruiters starting out.

Plans side by side

Greenhouse

CoreCustom
PlusCustom
ProCustom
Greenhouse pricing

hireEZ

Solo$494per month
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
hireEZ pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Greenhouse

  • Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
  • Strong reporting and data visibility
  • Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
  • Integration ecosystem and unified data
  • Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance

    hireEZ

    • AI-powered outbound sourcing
    • cross-platform talent mapping
    • diversity hiring support
    • AI-assisted sourcing capabilities
    • per-recruiter cost may be high relative to alternatives

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Greenhouse vs hireEZ”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/greenhouse-vs-hireez, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.