GreenhouseThe Orchestrated Hiring Ecosystem for the AI era
vs
hireEZEnterprise Hiring, Run by Agents. Recruiters Decide.
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Greenhouse vs hireEZ
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 2.5 for hireEZ, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Greenhouse if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 2.5)
- AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 29% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or GDPR or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
Choose hireEZ if…
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- AI-powered outbound sourcing
- cross-platform talent mapping
- diversity hiring support
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Greenhouse | hireEZ |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 38.5% | 2.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #1 | #33 |
| Share of voice | 8.1% | 1.1% |
| Mentions this run | 43 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 56% | 29% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Greenhouse 0pp · hireEZ 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GreenhousehireEZ
Head to head in AI answers
5 engine answers name both brands
5Greenhouse ranked higher
0hireEZ ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Greenhouse | hireEZ |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best recruiting tools in 2026? | AI Mode | #1 | #8 |
| What are the best recruiting tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #1 | #12 |
| Compare the leading recruiting platforms | ChatGPT | #1 | #15 |
| Best recruiting platform with AI features | Perplexity | #2 | #6 |
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | ChatGPT | #2 | #21 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Greenhouse | hireEZ |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $494 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 7-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Layered on top of the customer's existing ATS with no rip-and-replace, deployed in weeks. |
| Integrations | — | 40+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSS | — |
| Founded | 2012 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | Mountain View, California, US |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series D · $110M raised | Series C |
| Best for | Employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises | Enterprise talent acquisition teams that want agentic AI added to their existing ATS, as well as individual recruiters starting out. |
Plans side by side
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Greenhouse
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
- Strong reporting and data visibility
- Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
- Integration ecosystem and unified data
- Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance
hireEZ
- AI-powered outbound sourcing
- cross-platform talent mapping
- diversity hiring support
- AI-assisted sourcing capabilities
- per-recruiter cost may be high relative to alternatives
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Greenhouse vs hireEZ”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/greenhouse-vs-hireez, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.